Skip to content

#prey behavior

2 public questions tagged with this topic.

An increase in search time S1 will likely make prey2:

As S1 increases, the predator must wait longer to encounter the preferred prey 1. The expected rate from rejecting prey 2 and continuing to search therefore declines, making the immediate lower-profitability item more acceptable. This is the central diet-breadth prediction of optimal foraging theory: scarcity of the highest-ranked prey broadens the optimal diet, whereas abundance permits specialization. The profitability E2/h2 of prey 2 need not change; what changes is its value relative to the opportunity cost of continued searching. An increase in search time consequently shifts the acceptan

Ref: Ecology: From Individuals to Ecosystems, Begon et al., 5th Ed., Ch. 10

Grouping in prey like antelopes reduces:

Living in a group can lower each antelope's probability of being killed through several mechanisms. More individuals can detect predators earlier, coordinated escape can confuse an attacker, and the dilution effect spreads a given attack risk across many potential targets. Individuals near the center may also reduce their exposure through selfish-herd positioning. A larger aggregation may be easier for predators to notice, so grouping does not necessarily reduce predator attraction, yet per capita mortality can still decline once an attack occurs. The benefit concerns individual risk rather th

Ref: Ecology: From Individuals to Ecosystems, Begon et al., 5th Ed., Ch. 10