Skip to content
New summer mock series is live Attempt timed papers for SSC, banking, and engineering entrances with updated syllabi for this season. View exams

Gene regulation in Prokaryotes

Latest questions in this category.

30 questions

Alternative sigma factor σ32 is involved in

Alternative sigma factors redirect RNA polymerase holoenzyme to distinct promoter classes under stress conditions. Sigma32 encoded by rpoH in Escherichia coli accumulates during temperature upshift because heat-induced misfolded proteins titrate chaperones DnaK, DnaJ, GroEL, releasing sigma32 from sequestration and from FtsH-mediated proteolysis. Free sigma32 binds core polymerase, activating heat-shock promoters defined by -35 CTTGAA and -10 CCCCATNT consensus driving transcription of chaperones GroEL, DnaK, proteases ClpB, Lon, and repair proteins. This rapid reprogramming restores proteostasis, increases refolding capacity, and provides transient thermotolerance until homeostasis returns and sigma32 degraded via feedback regulation.

Ref: Lodish et al., Molecular Cell Biology, 9th ed., Chapter 8: Heat Shock Sigma Factor σ32 Regulation

CRISPR spacers represent

CRISPR arrays consist of alternating direct repeat sequences and unique spacers derived from prior encounters with mobile genetic elements. Bioinformatic comparisons demonstrate spacer origins matching bacteriophage genomes, plasmids, and transposons containing protospacer adjacent motifs required for interference. These stored fragments constitute molecular chronology of infection history, with new spacers added proximal to leader sequence and older spacers retained distally perhaps losing function. Transcription of entire array and processing into crRNAs allows sequence-specific recognition of returning invaders, enabling targeted nucleolytic destruction. Thus spacers are not random DNA but records enabling adaptive recall of pathogenic sequences encountered throughout lineage evolutionary trajectory.

Ref: NCBI Bookshelf, Bacteriology: CRISPR Loci Structure – Spacers as Memory of Past Infections

CRISPR provides bacteria with

CRISPR-Cas systems confer heritable sequence-specific defense fundamentally distinct from innate restriction-modification. Following initial infection, adaptation complex Cas1-Cas2 captures viral or plasmid protospacer DNA and integrates new spacer into leader-proximal end of CRISPR array. Upon reinfection, array transcribed and processed into crRNAs that guide Cas nucleases to complementary invader DNA or RNA for targeted cleavage. Spacer acquisition creates immunological memory improving resistance with repeated encounters, fulfilling criteria for Lamarckian inheritance. This adaptive character underpins repurposing for genome editing, while providing bacteria population-level immunity, spacer diversity, and protection against lytic phages preserving microbial ecosystems.

Ref: Alberts et al., Molecular Biology of the Cell, 7th ed., Chapter 5: CRISPR – Adaptive Immunity in Prokaryotes

Small RNA 6S RNA binds to

6S RNA is highly abundant ~184 nucleotide noncoding RNA accumulating during stationary phase and nutrient limitation in Escherichia coli that structurally mimics open promoter DNA bubble. Its conserved elongated duplex with central bulge and terminal loop fits within active site channel of sigma70 holoenzyme, specifically contacting beta, beta' subunits and sigma70 region 4.2. Sequestration globally downregulates transcription from strong sigma70 promoters, freeing core polymerase to associate with alternative sigma factors like sigmaS and sigma32. Upon nutrient upshift, 6S RNA serves as template for short product RNAs pRNA, causing conformational change releasing polymerase and restoring exponential growth transcriptional program rapidly.

Ref: NCBI Bookshelf, Molecular Biology: Bacterial Small RNAs – 6S RNA Control of Sigma70 RNA Polymerase

SAM riboswitch controls genes involved in

S-adenosylmethionine riboswitches constitute widespread SAM-I, SAM-II, SAM-III families positioned upstream of genes encoding enzymes for sulfur assimilation, methionine biosynthesis, SAM synthetase metK, and methionine importers. When intracellular SAM abundant, binding to aptamer core favors terminator stem or SD sequestration, repressing transcription or translation and preventing unnecessary synthesis. Low SAM shifts equilibrium toward antiterminator and ribosome access, inducing de novo methionine production from homoserine, cysteine, and methyl-tetrahydrofolate precursors. This feedback loop maintains methyl donor homeostasis vital for methylation of DNA, RNA, proteins, polyamine synthesis, and one-carbon metabolism across many Gram-positive bacteria and archaea.

Ref: Lodish et al., Molecular Cell Biology, 9th ed., Chapter 9: RNA-Based Regulation – SAM Riboswitch and Methionine Pathway

Riboswitch ligand binding occurs at

A canonical riboswitch comprises two functionally separable domains fused in single transcript. The 5' aptamer domain folds into highly specific pocket with conserved nucleotides and tertiary interactions that selectively bind metabolite via hydrogen bonding and stacking with nanomolar to micromolar affinity. Aptamer architecture often pre-organized to reduce entropic cost of binding. Ligand recognition stabilizes alternative base-pairing pattern in adjacent expression platform downstream. As sensor module, aptamer itself does not regulate but communicates ligand occupancy through allosteric structural switching. Crystallographic studies show tight enclosure of ligand, explaining exquisite discrimination between closely related analogues crucial for metabolic fidelity.

Ref: Alberts et al., Molecular Biology of the Cell, 7th ed., Chapter 6: RNA Regulation, Riboswitch Aptamer Domain

Riboswitch regulation occurs at level of

Riboswitches are cis-acting structured RNA elements located predominantly in 5' untranslated regions of bacterial mRNAs that directly sense metabolites without protein factors. Ligand binding to conserved aptamer induces conformational rearrangement of downstream expression platform, modulating gene expression response. Two widespread mechanisms exist: transcription attenuation through stabilization of intrinsic Rho-independent terminator hairpin versus antiterminator formation, and translational repression by sequestering Shine-Dalgarno sequence within stem-loop. This economical RNA-only feedback allows rapid response to amino acids, cofactors, nucleobases, regulating biosynthesis and transport operons quickly balancing metabolic needs without additional regulatory proteins.

Ref: NCBI Bookshelf, Biochemistry: Regulatory RNAs – Riboswitch Mechanism, Transcriptional and Translational Control

CAP-cAMP complex binds when

Catabolite repression couples glucose availability to cyclic AMP synthesis via adenylate cyclase. When glucose transport is low, EIIA phosphorylated activates cyclase, raising cAMP levels. Cyclic AMP binds catabolite activator protein CAP, inducing conformational shift allowing dimerization and DNA recognition. The CAP-cAMP complex binds conserved sites near catabolite-sensitive promoters including lac, ara, gal, facilitating RNA polymerase recruitment through alpha-CTD contact. When glucose abundant, cAMP falls, CAP remains inactive, transcription of alternative sugar operons reduced. Thus CAP-cAMP binding specifically signals carbon starvation and glucose limitation, coordinating hierarchical sugar utilization for energy efficiency.

Ref: Lodish et al., Molecular Cell Biology, 9th ed., Chapter 8: Bacterial Transcription Control and CAP-cAMP

Full activation of ara operon requires

The araBAD operon exemplifies dual positive control integrating substrate availability and catabolite status. In absence of arabinose, AraC represses by looping DNA between araO2 and araI1, occluding RNA polymerase. Arabinose binding converts AraC into an activator that occupies araI1 and araI2, contacting polymerase and inducing bending. Maximal transcription additionally needs glucose starvation signaling. Elevated cAMP binds CAP, which recognizes site upstream of araI, enhancing polymerase alpha-CTD interaction. Both arabinose and CAP-cAMP together relieve looping and stimulate initiation, enabling catabolism only when preferred sugars are depleted.

Ref: Alberts et al., Molecular Biology of the Cell, 7th ed., Chapter 7: Prokaryotic Transcription Regulation, ara Operon

In presence of arabinose, AraC binds to

Presence of L-arabinose triggers major structural rearrangement within AraC regulatory protein. Sugar molecule binds deep pocket within N-terminal domain forming hydrogen bonds that retract N-terminal arm from dimerization interface, altering interdomain orientation and allosteric communication. Dimer consequently loses high affinity for distal O2 site, abandons loop, and preferentially occupies adjacent half-sites araI1 centered minus 100 and araI2 at minus 50 directly upstream of PBAD promoter. Occupancy of I1-I2 positions AraC activation surface near minus45 facilitating direct interaction with sigma70 subunit and alpha C-terminal domain of RNA polymerase, breaking repressive loop and potently stimulating transcription initiation of araBAD catabolic genes.

Ref: Wikipedia L-arabinose operon – arabinose-bound AraC binds I1 and I2 acting as activator for araBAD expression.

DNA looping in ara operon causes

DNA looping in ara operon results from simultaneous binding of AraC dimer to distantly separated operator half-sites, bringing them into close physical proximity through protein-mediated bending. Looped complex imposes severe steric block on RNA polymerase binding site, prevents formation of transcription bubble, and constrains promoter DNA topology in configuration unfavorable for activation. This mechanical hindrance efficiently silences araBAD transcription in absence of inducing sugar, more effective than simple occupancy of single operator site, analogous to LacI repressor tetramer looping between O1 and auxiliary O2 or O3 sites enhancing repression thousandfold through increased local concentration of repressor near promoter region.

Ref: Wikipedia L-arabinose operon – DNA looping between AraC bound at araI and araO2 blocks RNA polymerase and causes repression.

In absence of arabinose, AraC binds to

Without L-arabinose, AraC apoprotein adopts conformation strongly promoting looping-mediated repression of araBAD operon. Dimer bridges high-affinity araO2 site centered approximately minus 280 upstream and araI1 site at minus 106, with intervening 210 base pairs bent into looped architecture demonstrated by electron microscopy. Crystallographic studies show N-terminal arms dimerize antiparallel, stabilizing loop topology. Looped conformation buries PBAD minus35 promoter element and occludes CAP-cAMP binding site, preventing RNA polymerase holoenzyme initiation. Approximately twenty AraC molecules per bacterial cell suffice to maintain tight repression, ensuring low basal expression until arabinose reaches threshold concentration sufficient to disrupt loop architecture.

Ref: Science DNA Looping by AraC – apo-AraC prefers looping between araO2 and araI1 repressing araBAD.