Skip to content
New summer mock series is live Attempt timed papers for SSC, banking, and engineering entrances with updated syllabi for this season. View exams

Mendelian Inheritance

Latest questions in this category.

30 questions

Which cross is useful to identify heterozygosity in an individual?

Identifying heterozygosity requires revealing masked recessive allele hidden by complete dominance. Crossing individual of unknown genotype to homozygous recessive tester aa allows both alleles from unknown parent to express phenomenologically. If unknown is AA, all progeny receive A and display dominant phenotype; if unknown is Aa, half progeny receive A, half a from that parent, producing 1 dominant :1 recessive ratio. Appearance of recessive class in progeny therefore proves heterozygosity. This test cross principle underlies breeding purity testing and pedigree verification in Mendelian genetics.

Ref: Snustad & Simmons, Principles of Genetics, 7th ed., Chapter 3: Test Cross for Detecting Heterozygosity

The number of different gametes produced by a heterozygote Aa is

A single locus heterozygous Aa contains two different alleles in diploid cell. During meiosis I, homologous chromosomes carrying A and a separate into different cells, ensuring each haploid gamete receives only one allele. No third allele type exists at that locus, so genetically distinct gamete classes number exactly two. This follows general formula 2^n where n is number of heterozygous loci; for n=1, 2^1 =2. Independent loci increase combinations, but monohybrid heterozygote limited to two, demonstrating segregation and explaining 1:1 gametic ratio.

Ref: Griffiths et al., Introduction to Genetic Analysis, 12th ed., Chapter 2: Gamete Formation and the 2^n Rule

In a test cross of a dihybrid, the phenotypic ratio expected is

A dihybrid test cross intercrosses double heterozygote AaBb with homozygous recessive tester aabb, directly exposing gamete constitution. When two genes assort independently, heterozygote meiosis generates four gamete types AB, Ab, aB, ab in equal 25% frequency due to random chromosome alignment at metaphase I and independent segregation. Tester parent contributes only ab gametes, so progeny genotypes AaBb, Aabb, aaBb, aabb appear equally, producing phenotypic ratio 1:1:1:1. Any significant deviation toward excess parental types indicates linkage and permits calculation of recombination frequency for constructing genetic linkage maps.

Ref: Hartl & Ruvolo, Genetics: Analysis of Genes and Genomes, 9th ed., Chapter 4: Dihybrid Test Cross and Independent Assortment

The law of segregation is also known as

Mendel's first law describes allele pairs remaining discrete within a heterozygote and segregating unchanged into gametes during meiosis without blending or contamination. Each gamete receives a single allele in pure form, which explains historic name purity of gametes. For genotype Aa, meiosis produces 50% A and 50% a gametes with equal probability. Random fertilization restores diploidy, yielding classic 3:1 F2 phenotypic ratio where recessive trait reappears intact after being masked in F1. This principle underpins monohybrid inheritance and gamete purity concept.

Ref: Griffiths et al., Introduction to Genetic Analysis, 12th ed., Chapter 2: Law of Segregation and Purity of Gametes

Mendel’s experiments were successful mainly because

Mendel's experiments succeeded largely because he selected traits showing discontinuous variation with clearly separable phenotypic classes controlled by single major genes. Pea characters like seed shape, flower colour and pod form segregated into discrete categories without intermediate blending, enabling counting and ratio calculation. Polygenic continuous traits would have produced overlapping distributions obscuring segregation, variable environment would increase noise, linked genes would distort independent assortment, focus on unlinked Mendelian discontinuous characters was key to discovering laws. This principle is routinely tested in NEET, CBSE 11-12, CUET, CSIR-NET, GATE and MSc Genetics examinations requiring clear conceptual distinction.

Ref: Griffiths et al., Introduction to Genetic Analysis, 12th ed., Chapter 2: Mendel's Success Discontinuous Traits

The phenotypic expression of a heterozygote in Mendelian inheritance shows

In Mendelian inheritance with complete dominance, heterozygote carries one dominant and one recessive allele but produces sufficient dominant gene product to achieve dominant phenotype threshold, such as enzyme activity or structural protein. Consequently phenotypic expression of heterozygote shows dominant trait, identical to homozygous dominant, e.g., tall Tt same as TT. Recessive trait appears only in tt lacking dominant allele. Blended or intermediate trait characterises incomplete dominance, not Mendelian complete dominance where heterozygote fully expresses dominant phenotype. Cytological correlation with prophase pairing, metaphase alignment and anaphase separation provides visual anchor for memorising genetic laws.

Ref: Snustad & Simmons, Principles of Genetics, 7th ed., Chapter 3: Heterozygote Expression

Which cross gives information about types of gametes formed?

Cross revealing types of gametes formed is test cross where individual of interest mated to homozygous recessive tester. Because tester contributes invariant recessive allele, phenotype of each progeny directly reflects gamete received from tested individual, uncovering parental versus recombinant classes and frequencies. Self cross or back cross to dominant parent masks recessive gametes, reciprocal cross compares parental sex effects not gamete content. Test cross therefore provides information about gamete spectrum, recombination frequency and genotype composition essential for linkage mapping. Mastery ensures accurate interpretation of monohybrid and dihybrid progeny arrays, distinguishing dominance interactions from epistasis or linkage effects.

Ref: Griffiths et al., Introduction to Genetic Analysis, 12th ed., Chapter 4: Gamete Types Test Cross

If all F2 progeny show dominant phenotype, the genotype of F1 was

If all F2 progeny exhibit dominant phenotype after selfing, parental F1 could not have contributed recessive allele to any zygote, genotype must be homozygous dominant TT producing only T gametes. Heterozygous Tt would have generated 25 percent recessive tt progeny giving 3:1 ratio, tt would produce all recessive, mixture Tt and TT would also produce some recessive when Tt mothers contribute t. Uniformly dominant F2 therefore indicates fixation of dominant allele in F1, genotype TT only capable of such outcome. Conceptual clarity supports solving numerical problems involving segregation ratios, recombination frequencies and probability calculations in crosses.

Ref: Hartl & Ruvolo, Genetics, 9th ed., Chapter 2: Homozygous Dominant F1 Identification

The purpose of a reciprocal cross is to test

Purpose of reciprocal cross is to test sex linkage versus autosomal inheritance. Swapping male and female parental phenotypes, such as tall female by dwarf male versus dwarf female by tall male, yields identical results for autosomal genes because transmission independent of parental sex. For X-linked genes results differ due to hemizygous male inheritance and dosage, revealing criss-cross pattern. Gene purity assessed by test cross, independent assortment by dihybrid ratio, mutation rate not addressed, reciprocal design specifically diagnoses sex-linked transmission. Understanding this mechanism aids pedigree analysis, Punnett predictions, linkage mapping and appreciating evolutionary conservation across taxa.

Ref: Pierce, Genetics, 7th ed., Chapter 4: Sex Linkage Test via Reciprocal Cross

In a monohybrid self-cross, total possible genotype combinations are

Monohybrid self-cross Tt by Tt generates two gamete types per parent T and t. Combining in Punnett square produces four possible fertilisation events representing total genotype combinations regardless of identity, namely T fertilised by T, T by t, t by T and t by t. Two middle events share genotype Tt, resulting in distinguishable genotypes three but combinations four. Count two reflects allele number, three distinct genotypes, eight would require three segregating genes, accurate total possible zygotic combinations four underlies 1:2:1 genotypic ratio. This principle is routinely tested in NEET, CBSE 11-12, CUET, CSIR-NET, GATE

Ref: Snustad & Simmons, Principles of Genetics, 7th ed., Chapter 3: Punnett Combinations

In monohybrid inheritance, the number of phenotypic classes in F2 is

In monohybrid inheritance with complete dominance, F2 generation from Tt selfing shows three genotypes TT, Tt and tt but collapses into two phenotypic classes dominant tall comprising TT and Tt and recessive dwarf tt. Number of phenotypic classes therefore two. Single class would indicate fixation, three classes implies incomplete dominance or codominance with distinct heterozygous phenotype, four classes correspond to dihybrid phenotypic array 9:3:3:1. Dominance interaction reduces genotypic diversity to binary phenotypic distinction central to Mendelian monohybrid analysis. Cytological correlation with prophase pairing, metaphase alignment and anaphase separation provides visual anchor for memorising genetic laws.

Ref: Pierce, Genetics, 7th ed., Chapter 3: Phenotypic Classes F2

A pure tall plant crossed with a dwarf plant produces all tall F1 progeny because

Pure tall genotype TT crossed with dwarf tt generates all heterozygous F1 Tt progeny. Tall phenotype predominates because tall allele is dominant, encoding functional product promoting gibberellin synthesis and internode elongation sufficient at single dose, while dwarf allele is recessive loss-of-function. Dwarf allele hidden in heterozygote, only expresses when homozygous tt. Tall recessive or dwarf dominant hypotheses predict opposite or mixed F1 phenotypes, linkage would cause distorted segregation not uniform tall, dominance concept explains observed all tall F1 result. Mastery ensures accurate interpretation of monohybrid and dihybrid progeny arrays, distinguishing dominance interactions from epistasis or linkage effects.

Ref: Griffiths et al., Introduction to Genetic Analysis, 12th ed., Chapter 2: Dominance Tall Pea