Skip to content

#population biology

15 public questions tagged with this topic.

The most common dispersion pattern observed in nature is:

“Clumped” for the most common dispersion pattern observed in nature is. This relationship follows from the ecological mechanism represented by the terms in the item, not merely from an association between their names. Population ecology links individual births, deaths, immigration, and emigration to changes in abundance. Per-capita rates determine the direction of change, while density dependence creates feedback when crowding alters survival or reproduction. The remaining alternatives—“Random”, “Uniform”, “Regular”—refer to different states, processes, or scales and therefore do not express t

Ref: Campbell Biology, Urry et al., 12th Ed., Unit 8 Ecology

Which of the following describes the dispersion pattern where individuals are evenly spaced?

“Uniform dispersion” for which of the following describes the dispersion pattern where individuals are evenly spaced. This relationship follows from the ecological mechanism represented by the terms in the item, not merely from an association between their names. Interpretation must distinguish absolute population change from a per-capita rate and must state the time interval and population boundary. Age structure, dispersal, environmental variation, and delayed responses can all make observed trajectories depart from a simple model. The remaining alternatives—“Clumped dispersion”, “Random dis

Ref: Campbell Biology, Urry et al., 12th Ed., Unit 8 Ecology

Which statement best describes a metapopulation?

A metapopulation consists of multiple local subpopulations occupying separate habitat patches and linked by dispersal. Each patch can have its own births, deaths, density, and risk of extinction, while emigrants connect local dynamics by colonizing empty patches or supplementing occupied ones. Regional persistence can therefore occur despite recurring local extinctions. A single local population lacks this explicit patch network, and a completely isolated group cannot undergo the colonization–extinction balance central to metapopulation theory. The subpopulations need not be genetically identi

Ref: Ecology: Concepts and Applications, Molles, 9th Ed., Ch. 9

If r = 0.2, doubling time is:

During exponential growth, doubling time is ln(2)/r. With r = 0.2 per unit time, doubling time is approximately 0.693/0.2 = 3.47 time units. The relation follows by setting N(t)/N(0) = 2 in N(t) = N(0)e^(rt) and solving for t. Parameters have clear roles: N is current abundance, r is the maximum per-capita rate under the model, and K is the positive equilibrium set by environmental capacity. The term 1 - N/K supplies negative feedback. Checking limiting cases at N = 0, N = K, and N far below K is an efficient way to test an interpretation. The decisive distinction is therefore between a descri

Ref: Ecology: Concepts and Applications, Molles, 9th Ed., Ch. 11

CSIR-NET: Allee effect refers to:

“Increased fitness with population size” for csir-net: allee effect refers to. This relationship follows from the ecological mechanism represented by the terms in the item, not merely from an association between their names. Interpretation must distinguish absolute population change from a per-capita rate and must state the time interval and population boundary. Age structure, dispersal, environmental variation, and delayed responses can all make observed trajectories depart from a simple model. The remaining alternatives—“Decreased fitness at high density”, “Fitness is unrelated to population

Ref: Campbell Biology, Urry et al., 12th Ed., Unit 8 Ecology

Which curve in survivorship shows density-dependent mortality?

“Type I” for which curve in survivorship shows density-dependent mortality. This relationship follows from the ecological mechanism represented by the terms in the item, not merely from an association between their names. Survivorship curves summarize age-specific mortality: Type I concentrates loss late in life, Type II approximates a constant hazard, and Type III concentrates loss early. They are empirical patterns, not rigid taxonomic rules. The remaining alternatives—“Type II”, “Type III”, “Logistic”—refer to different states, processes, or scales and therefore do not express the same caus

Ref: Campbell Biology, Urry et al., 12th Ed., Unit 8 Ecology

Poor dispersers in fragmented habitats:

“Are at higher extinction risk” for poor dispersers in fragmented habitats. This relationship follows from the ecological mechanism represented by the terms in the item, not merely from an association between their names. The mechanism should be evaluated across both local and global scales. Local disappearance can be reversed by recolonization, whereas global extinction is irreversible and requires the loss of every surviving population. The remaining alternatives—“Adapt well to new environments”, “Easily migrate”, “Show higher reproductive rate”—refer to different states, processes, or scale

Ref: Conservation Biology, Primack & Sher, 6th Ed., Ch. 7

An organism with low variability in population size is:

“Less extinction prone” for an organism with low variability in population size is. This relationship follows from the ecological mechanism represented by the terms in the item, not merely from an association between their names. The mechanism should be evaluated across both local and global scales. Local disappearance can be reversed by recolonization, whereas global extinction is irreversible and requires the loss of every surviving population. The remaining alternatives—“Highly extinction prone”, “Genetically unstable”, “Unable to adapt”—refer to different states, processes, or scales and t

Ref: Conservation Biology, Primack & Sher, 6th Ed., Ch. 7

Which of the following is most vulnerable to extinction?

“High variability in population size” for which of the following is most vulnerable to extinction. This relationship follows from the ecological mechanism represented by the terms in the item, not merely from an association between their names. The mechanism should be evaluated across both local and global scales. Local disappearance can be reversed by recolonization, whereas global extinction is irreversible and requires the loss of every surviving population. The remaining alternatives—“Wide geographic range”, “Low trophic level”, “High dispersal ability”—refer to different states, processes

Ref: Conservation Biology, Primack & Sher, 6th Ed., Ch. 7