Skip to content

#polarization

22 public questions tagged with this topic.

What causes the intensity to vary when a second polaroid is rotated in front of another polaroid through which unpolariz

**Convex lens focusing** plane wave into point because lens introduces phase delay proportional to thickness, converting plane wavefront to spherical converging to focal point, property ensures rays parallel to axis meet at focus, spherical aberration minimized for paraxial rays, lensmaker's formula determines focal length. The first polaroid polarizes the light linearly, and the second allows only the component of the electric field aligned with its pass-axis, varying with the angle via Malus’ law. Using Δ = d sinθ, y = n λ D/d, a sinθ = n λ, I = I₀ cos²θ, n = c/v, sinC = 1/n, λ' = λ/n and A

Ref: NCERT > Physics Book > Wave Optics > Optical Phenomena and Applications

What causes the intensity of light to vary sinusoidally with angle when passing through two polaroids?

**Polarization requires transverse waves** because only transverse can have orientation perpendicular to propagation, longitudinal cannot be polarized, wave theory requires light transverse to explain polarization, polaroids transmit only component along pass-axis, unpolarized has random transverse orientations, after polaroid polarized. The intensity follows Malus’ law, where it varies as the square of the cosine of the angle between the polaroids’ axes, producing a sinusoidal pattern. Using Δ = d sinθ, y = n λ D/d, a sinθ = n λ, I = I₀ cos²θ, n = c/v, sinC = 1/n, λ' = λ/n and A = 2a cos(φ/2)

Ref: NCERT > Physics Book > Wave Optics > Optical Phenomena and Applications

What is the intensity of light after passing through two polaroids with pass-axes at \( 45^\circ \), if the initial unpo

**Incoherent sources** intensity adds I = I₁+I₂, no interference pattern because phase random, two independent sources cannot produce stable interference because phase difference fluctuates rapidly, coherent sources required with constant phase, laser coherent, visibility of fringes requires coherence, degree of coherence determines contrast. After the first polaroid, I = (I₀/2) . After the second at 45° , I = (I₀/2) cos² 45° = (I₀/2) × (1/2) = (I₀/4) . Using Δ = d sinθ, y = n λ D/d, a sinθ = n λ, I = I₀ cos²θ, n = c/v, sinC = 1/n, λ' = λ/n and A = 2a cos(φ/2), calculation gives (I₀/4),

Ref: NCERT > Physics Book > Wave Optics > Optical Phenomena and Applications

Why does the intensity of light transmitted through two polaroids become zero when their axes are at 90° to each other?

**Polarization** transverse wave property, light after polaroid polarized along pass-axis, Malus law I = I₀ cos²θ, θ angle between pass-axes, initial unpolarized intensity I₀ after first polaroid I₁ = I₀/2, after second at 45° I₂ = I₁ cos²45°= I₀/2×0.5= I₀/4, after two perpendicular 90° I=0 because cos90°=0, for 60° I= I₀/2×cos²60°= I₀/2×0.25= I₀/8. The first polaroid aligns the electric field, and the second, perpendicular to it, blocks all components, as the cosine of 90° is zero in the intensity relation. Using Δ = d sinθ, y = n λ D/d, a sinθ = n λ, I = I₀ cos²θ, n = c/v, sinC = 1/n,

Ref: NCERT > Physics Book > Wave Optics > Polarization and Malus Law

What allows light to continue propagating as a transverse wave after passing through a polaroid?

**Polarization** transverse wave property, light after polaroid polarized along pass-axis, Malus law I = I₀ cos²θ, θ angle between pass-axes, initial unpolarized intensity I₀ after first polaroid I₁ = I₀/2, after second at 45° I₂ = I₁ cos²45°= I₀/2×0.5= I₀/4, after two perpendicular 90° I=0 because cos90°=0, for 60° I= I₀/2×cos²60°= I₀/2×0.25= I₀/8. The transverse nature of light, with electric fields oscillating perpendicular to propagation, is preserved, but restricted to the polaroid’s pass-axis direction. Using Δ = d sinθ, y = n λ D/d, a sinθ = n λ, I = I₀ cos²θ, n = c/v, sinC = 1/n, λ' =

Ref: NCERT > Physics Book > Wave Optics > Polarization and Malus Law

What is the intensity of light after passing through two polaroids with pass-axes at \( 15^\circ \), if the initial unpo

**Two polaroids** with pass-axes perpendicular intensity zero because second blocks component, with 45° intensity I₀/4 if initial after first I₀, if initial unpolarized I₀, after first I₀/2 then after second at 45° I₀/4. Three polaroids first and third crossed 90°, middle at 45° maximum transmission because middle rotates polarization, I after first I₀/2, after middle at 45° I₀/4, after third at 45° to middle I₀/4×cos²45°= I₀/8, non-zero, maximum when middle 45°. After the first polaroid, I = (I₀/2) . After the second at 15° , I = (I₀/2) cos² 15° . cos 15° ≈ 0.966 , I = (I₀/2) × (0.966)² = (I₀

Ref: NCERT > Physics Book > Wave Optics > Polarization and Malus Law

What is the intensity of light after passing through two polaroids with pass-axes at \( 30^\circ \), if the initial unpo

**Polaroid rotation** intensity varies sinusoidally with angle due to Malus law I = I₀ cos²θ, when polaroid rotated 90° from initial, intensity goes from max to zero, for unpolarized light rotating polaroid does not change intensity after first polaroid because average, but second polaroid intensity depends on relative angle, explains why intensity transmitted through two polaroids drops to zero when perpendicular. After the first polaroid, I = (I₀/2) . After the second at 30° , I = (I₀/2) cos² 30° = (I₀/2) × (3/4) = (3I₀/8) . Using Δ = d sinθ, y = n λ D/d, a sinθ = n λ, I = I₀

Ref: NCERT > Physics Book > Wave Optics > Polarization and Malus Law

What characteristic of light waves allows polarization to occur, distinguishing them from sound waves?

**Two polaroids** with pass-axes perpendicular intensity zero because second blocks component, with 45° intensity I₀/4 if initial after first I₀, if initial unpolarized I₀, after first I₀/2 then after second at 45° I₀/4. Three polaroids first and third crossed 90°, middle at 45° maximum transmission because middle rotates polarization, I after first I₀/2, after middle at 45° I₀/4, after third at 45° to middle I₀/4×cos²45°= I₀/8, non-zero, maximum when middle 45°. Light waves are transverse, with electric fields oscillating perpendicular to the propagation direction, enabling polarization, unli

Ref: NCERT > Physics Book > Wave Optics > Polarization and Malus Law

What is the nature of light waves demonstrated by polarization?

**Two polaroids** with pass-axes perpendicular intensity zero because second blocks component, with 45° intensity I₀/4 if initial after first I₀, if initial unpolarized I₀, after first I₀/2 then after second at 45° I₀/4. Three polaroids first and third crossed 90°, middle at 45° maximum transmission because middle rotates polarization, I after first I₀/2, after middle at 45° I₀/4, after third at 45° to middle I₀/4×cos²45°= I₀/8, non-zero, maximum when middle 45°. Polarization shows that light waves are transverse, as only transverse waves can be polarized. Using Δ = d sinθ, y = n λ D/d, a sinθ

Ref: NCERT > Physics Book > Wave Optics > Polarization and Malus Law

What is the nature of unpolarized light?

**Two polaroids** with pass-axes perpendicular intensity zero because second blocks component, with 45° intensity I₀/4 if initial after first I₀, if initial unpolarized I₀, after first I₀/2 then after second at 45° I₀/4. Three polaroids first and third crossed 90°, middle at 45° maximum transmission because middle rotates polarization, I after first I₀/2, after middle at 45° I₀/4, after third at 45° to middle I₀/4×cos²45°= I₀/8, non-zero, maximum when middle 45°. Unpolarized light has electric vectors oscillating in all directions in the plane perpendicular to the propagation direction, random

Ref: NCERT > Physics Book > Wave Optics > Polarization and Malus Law

What is the maximum intensity of light transmitted through three polaroids when the first and third are crossed, and the

**Polaroid rotation** intensity varies sinusoidally with angle due to Malus law I = I₀ cos²θ, when polaroid rotated 90° from initial, intensity goes from max to zero, for unpolarized light rotating polaroid does not change intensity after first polaroid because average, but second polaroid intensity depends on relative angle, explains why intensity transmitted through two polaroids drops to zero when perpendicular. For crossed polaroids, intensity after the second polaroid is I₀ cos² θ , and after the third (at 90° - θ ) is I = I₀ cos² θ sin² θ = (I₀/4) sin² 2θ . Maximum occurs at θ = 45° , so

Ref: NCERT > Physics Book > Wave Optics > Polarization and Malus Law

What happens to the intensity of light when it passes through a polaroid and the polaroid is rotated by \( 90^\circ \) f

**Polarization** transverse wave property, light after polaroid polarized along pass-axis, Malus law I = I₀ cos²θ, θ angle between pass-axes, initial unpolarized intensity I₀ after first polaroid I₁ = I₀/2, after second at 45° I₂ = I₁ cos²45°= I₀/2×0.5= I₀/4, after two perpendicular 90° I=0 because cos90°=0, for 60° I= I₀/2×cos²60°= I₀/2×0.25= I₀/8. For unpolarized light, intensity after one polaroid is (I₀/2) . Rotating by 90° from the pass-axis gives I = (I₀/2) cos² 90° = 0 . It reduces to zero from its initial value. Using Δ = d sinθ, y = n λ D/d, a sinθ = n λ, I = I₀ cos²θ,

Ref: NCERT > Physics Book > Wave Optics > Polarization and Malus Law