Skip to content

#permissive induction

3 public questions tagged with this topic.

What property distinguishes instructive induction from permissive induction?

Distinction between instructive and permissive induction lies in provision of novel fate information versus supportive environment. Instructive induction actively redirects competent cells toward new fate via specific instructive ligand altering gene regulatory network, e.g., mesenchyme instructing epithelium to form salivary branching via FGF10. Without instructive signal alternative fate does not occur. Permissive induction permits execution of already determined program by providing extracellular matrix, survival factors or hormones permitting differentiation but not changing fate choice. Therefore instructive requires specific signal to induce differentiation, permissive allows differentiation without specific instructive cue, relying on tissue autonomy plus environment permitting expression.

Ref: Gilbert, Developmental Biology, 12th ed., Chapter 3: Instructive vs Permissive Induction Differences.

Which of the following statements is true regarding permissive induction?

Permissive induction describes interaction where responder is already determined and inductor merely provides permissive environment allowing execution of intrinsic program. Mammary epithelium predetermined for milk protein synthesis requires laminin-rich basement membrane to activate prolactin signaling and STAT5. Without matrix genes remain silent but potential persists, demonstrating matrix dependence. This contrasts with instructive where new genes induced de novo. Matrix acts as scaffold enabling survival, polarity and transcription, reflecting supportive rather than instructive role during late differentiation and functional maturation stages.

Ref: Gilbert, Developmental Biology, 12th ed., Chapter 3: Permissive Induction and Basement Membrane.

What property distinguishes instructive induction from permissive induction?

Instructive induction provides new positional information that changes responder fate, requiring specific ligand-receptor interaction leading to altered transcription program and commitment. For example, ureteric bud-derived GDNF induces mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition and nephron gene expression via Ret receptor and Wnt4 cascade. Permissive induction does not direct fate; competent tissue already specified only needs permissive environment like extracellular matrix or trophic factor to realize intrinsic program. Blocking instructive signal abrogates fate change, while permissive signals can be replaced by unrelated substitutes supporting survival. Therefore specificity and fate-changing instruction defines instructive versus permissive mechanisms in development.

Ref: Gilbert, Developmental Biology, 12th ed., Chapter 3: Instructive versus Permissive Embryonic Induction.