Skip to content

#morphogen gradient

5 public questions tagged with this topic.

Which property defines a morphogen gradient?

Morphogen gradient property that confers patterning capacity is ability to influence discrete cell fate decisions proportionally to local ligand concentration via threshold decoding. Unlike uniform growth factors causing graded proliferation, morphogens exhibit threshold responses where target enhancers possess different affinities for effectors, activating sequentially as concentration rises. This converts analog concentration into digital transcriptional outputs generating distinct spatial domains. Uniform diffusion alone insufficient; must couple to differential activation and cross-repression. Short-range restriction or apoptotic activation not defining. Therefore concentration-dependent fate specification constitutes core defining attribute of morphogen interpretation across embryos.

Ref: Gilbert, Developmental Biology, 12th ed., Chapter 4: Morphogen Gradient Threshold Interpretation.

In the 'French flag model' of morphogen action, what determines cell fate?

Lewis Wolpert's French flag model proposed that positional information is encoded by a diffusible morphogen gradient. Cells detect local ligand concentration through surface receptors and intracellular transducers, converting continuous gradient into discrete thresholds. Low, intermediate and high doses activate distinct enhancers and transcription factors, producing three broad fate domains resembling a tricolour flag. Thus fate depends not on receptor number, mitotic rate or linear distance but on quantitative interpretation of morphogen exposure during patterning of limb buds, neural tube and Drosophila imaginal discs and vertebrate axis.

Ref: Gilbert, Developmental Biology, 12th ed., Chapter 4: French Flag Model and Morphogen Gradients.

Which morphogen gradient is essential for neural tube dorsalization?

Neural tube dorsoventral axis opposite ventral Hedgehog is BMP dorsalization from roof plate and surface ectoderm. Roof plate secretes BMP2, BMP4, BMP6, BMP7 and Wnt1, Wnt3a establishing high dorsal BMP concentration activating Smad1/5/8 to induce transcription factors Atoh1, Olig3, Pax3, Pax7 specifying dorsal interneurons dl1-dl6 and neural crest progenitors via Id inhibition and Msx. Shh from floor plate induces ventral Nkx2.2, Olig2 motor neurons. Genetic ablation of BMP receptors causes loss of dorsal cell types with ventral expansion; opposite of Shh mutants. Therefore BMP gradient essential dorsal patterning complement to ventral Shh system.

Ref: Lee & Jessell, Annual Review Neuroscience 1999: BMP roof plate gradient dorsalizes neural tube and neural crest.

Which morphogen gradient determines primary and secondary vulval cell fates?

Anchor cell LIN-3 forms graded spatial distribution across P3.p-P8.p equivalence group functioning as classic morphogen. High concentration at P6.p activates strong EGFR MAPK output surpassing threshold for primary 1° fate via egl-17 FGF and lin-39 targets inducing vulE vulF toroids. Lower concentration plus lateral LIN-12 Notch activation induced by DSL ligands APX-1, LAG-2 from P6.p induces secondary 2° fate in P5.p and P7.p expressing lip-1 phosphatase and lst repressors. Absence leads to tertiary 3° hypodermal fate. Dosage experiments displacing anchor cell demonstrate dose-dependent switching.

Ref: Greenwald & Kovall, Genetics: LIN-3/EGF morphogen gradient patterning primary and secondary vulval fates.

Which morphogen gradient influences primary and secondary vulval cell fates?

Primary and secondary vulval fates are graded by LIN-3/EGF morphogen secreted from anchor cell. LIN-3 forms diffusion gradient highest at P6.p overlying AC, intermediate at P5.p and P7.p, low at distant P3.p, P4.p, P8.p. High concentration surpasses threshold activating LET-23 EGFR to MAPK to LIN-1 inhibition, driving primary genes egl-17. Lower LIN-3 combined with lateral LIN-12 Notch activation specifies secondary fate expressing secondary markers. Experimental expression of LIN-3 under heat-shock promoter induces ectopic primary cells proportional to dose, demonstrating morphogen interpretation. Therefore LIN-3 gradient patterns 3-2-1-2-3 array in competent group.

Ref: Katz et al. 1995; WormBook: LIN-3 EGF morphogen gradient influencing VPC fates.