Skip to content
Login Register

#epigenetics

15 public questions tagged with this topic.

Pedigree Analysis

Genomic imprinting refers to

Genomic imprinting represents epigenetic phenomenon where allele expression depends on parental origin due to differential DNA methylation marks established during gametogenesis in sperm and egg. Imprinted genes carry methylation imprint silencing one parental copy permanently in somatic cells, so only maternal or paternal allele transcribes in offspring tissues like placenta and brain. This parent-specific monoallelic expression regulates growth, metabolism, and neurodevelopment. Loss of imprinting regulation leads to dosage abnormalities causing disorders like Angelman, Prader-Willi, Beckwith-Wiedemann, highlighting importance of parental-origin-dependent expression beyond Mendelian rules.

Ref: Griffiths et al., Introduction to Genetic Analysis, 12th ed., Chapter 18: Definition of Genomic Imprinting

View Details
Eukaryotes gene regulation

Sir2 protein mainly causes:

Sir2 founding member of sirtuin family is NAD-dependent class III histone deacetylase central to mating type and telomere silencing in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Sir2 catalyzes deacetylation of acetyl-lysine producing deacetylated histone, nicotinamide, O-acetyl-ADP-ribose using NAD as co-substrate. Preferred substrates H4K16ac, H3K9ac, H3K14ac removal creates hypoacetylated nucleosomes high-affinity for Sir3 bromo adjacent homology domain and Sir4 binding, enabling spreading of SIR complex. Fission yeast Sir2 similarly deacetylates H3K9ac facilitating Clr4 methylation. Sir2 also deacetylates non-histone proteins linking metabolic NAD levels to epigenetic state and longevity regulation. Its activity opposed by acetyltransferases Sas2, Gcn5 establishing dynamic acetylation equilibrium controlling silencing domains.

Ref: Alberts et al., Molecular Biology of the Cell, 7th ed., Chapter 4: Sir2 Histone Deacetylation and Heterochromatin Spreading

View Details
Regulation of chromatin structure

Which protein domain interacts with unmodified histone tails?

Reader domains distinguish modification state of histone tails to translate histone code into functional outcomes. SANT domains, named after Swi3, Ada2, N-Cor, TFIIIB, are structurally related to Myb DNA-binding motifs and found in co-repressor and remodeling subunits including SMRT, Ada2 and ISWI. Biochemical studies show SANT2 of SMRT and SANT of Ada2 preferentially bind unacetylated H3 and H4 tails, increasing affinity of associated deacetylase and acetyltransferase complexes for hypoacetylated substrates. Tetracetylation of H4 disrupts this interaction, illustrating sensitivity to modification status without direct recognition of methyl or acetyl marks.

Ref: Guo et al., Nature Scientific Reports, EZH2 SANT1 Domain Reads Unmodified H4 Tail, Structural Basis

View Details
Regulation of chromatin structure

Which histone tail modification is mainly associated with chromatin opening?

Chromatin accessibility regulated by chemical state of histone tails altering net charge. Among modifications, lysine acetylation catalyzed by HAT families GCN5, p300, Myst neutralizes epsilon-amino positive charge, weakening histone-DNA electrostatic contacts and disrupting internucleosomal H4 tail-acidic patch interaction essential for 30 nanometer fiber condensation, thereby promoting open euchromatic state. Methylation retains positive charge and can recruit repressors or activators depending context, phosphorylation adds negative charge mainly signaling mitosis or damage rather than general opening, ubiquitination adds bulky 76 amino acid protein altering stability. Therefore acetylation most directly linked to chromatin opening.

Ref: Allfrey et al., 1964; Lodish et al., Molecular Cell Biology, 9th ed., Histone Tail Modification Mainly Acetylation Opening

View Details
Eukaryotic chromatin and chromosome

Histone acetylation causes:

Acetylation of epsilon amino groups on histone tail lysines by HAT complexes like p300, CBP and GCN5 neutralizes positive charge, weakening interaction with negatively charged phosphate backbone and loosening nucleosome wrapping around DNA gyres. Bromodomain-containing proteins specifically recognize acetyllysine and recruit ATP remodelers and polymerase associated factors. Acetylation at H4 K16 directly disrupts interaction with acidic patch on neighboring H2A-H2B dimer required for 30 nanometer fiber formation. Consequently acetylation produces open relaxed chromatin permissive for transcription, replication and repair, opposing condensation and methylation-driven silencing pathways effectively.

Ref: Allfrey et al., 1964; Alberts et al., Molecular Biology of the Cell, Chapter 4: Histone Acetylation Causes Relaxation

View Details
Eukaryotic chromatin and chromosome

DNA methylation usually causes:

DNA methylation at 5-methylcytosine within CpG context catalyzed by DNMT1 maintenance during replication and DNMT3A/3B de novo enzymes generally correlates with stable gene silencing. Methyl-CpG recruits methyl-binding domain proteins MeCP2, MBD1, MBD2 which recruit histone deacetylase complexes and H3K9 methyltransferases, generating compact repressive chromatin impeding transcription factor access. Promoter methylation blocks initiation and maintains X inactivation and genomic imprinting. Removal via TET-mediated hydroxymethylation restores activity, confirming methylation predominantly represses transcription rather than activating replication or recombination alone in differentiated tissues.

Ref: Bird and Wolffe 1999 Methylation Mechanisms; Lodish et al., Chapter 8: DNA Methylation Usually Causes Repression

View Details
Eukaryotic chromatin and chromosome

Polycomb proteins cause:

Polycomb group proteins maintain developmental regulators silenced through epigenetic memory. PRC2 complex containing EZH2, EED, SUZ12 catalyzes H3K27 trimethylation, PRC1 containing BMI1, RING1B ubiquitinates histone H2A at lysine 119 and compacts chromatin, blocking SWI/SNF remodeling and preventing RNA polymerase II elongation. Targets include HOX clusters and lineage transcription factors. Compaction renders chromatin inaccessible. Polycomb loss results in ectopic gene activation and homeotic transformations. Unlike constitutive activators, Polycomb establishes facultative heterochromatin reversible during differentiation and reprogramming processes, ensuring cell identity maintenance.

Ref: Lewis Polycomb 1978; Lodish et al., Molecular Cell Biology, Chapter 8: Polycomb Proteins Cause Gene Repression

View Details
Eukaryotic chromatin and chromosome

Which histone modification activates transcription?

Active promoter epigenetic signature includes specific histone methylation. H3 lysine 4 trimethylation deposited by SET1 and MLL complexes at transcription start sites recruits chromatin remodelers, histone acetyltransferases and general transcription factor TFIID via TAF3 PHD finger recognition, reducing nucleosome stability and stimulating preinitiation complex assembly and pause release. Conversely H3K9 trimethylation and H3K27 trimethylation deposited by SUV39H and Polycomb EZH2 cause repression. H4K20 trimethylation marks pericentric heterochromatin. Thus H3K4 trimethylation functions as universal epigenetic hallmark of actively transcribed euchromatic genes across eukaryotes.

Ref: Santos-Rosa et al., Nature 2002; Alberts et al., Molecular Biology of the Cell, Chapter 4: H3K4me3 Active Transcription

View Details
Eukaryotic chromatin and chromosome

H3K9 methylation marks:

Histone code marks specific chromatin states. H3 lysine 9 di and trimethylation catalyzed by SUV39H1 and SUV39H2 methyltransferases creates high affinity binding site for heterochromatin protein 1 alpha via its chromodomain, inducing spreading, compaction and transcriptional repression. H3K9 trimethylation enriched at pericentric satellite repeats, subtelomeric repeats and retrotransposons characterizes constitutive heterochromatin, contrasting with H3K4 trimethylation at active promoters. HP1 oligomerization and interaction with DNMTs maintain domain stability. Disruption causes position effect variegation, ectopic transcription and chromosome missegregation defects compromising genome stability severely.

Ref: Bannister et al., Nature 2001; Lodish et al., Molecular Cell Biology, 9th ed., Chapter 8: H3K9 Methylation Heterochromatin Mark

View Details
Eukaryotic chromatin and chromosome

Histone tails are site of:

Histone octamer contains flexible unstructured N-terminal tails and protruding C-termini extending beyond DNA gyres. These lysine, arginine and serine rich segments undergo extensive covalent post-translational modifications including acetylation, methylation, phosphorylation, ubiquitination and sumoylation catalyzed by writer enzymes and erased by erasers. Modifications alter electrostatic charge and create binding sites for effector proteins containing bromodomains, chromodomains and PHD fingers, forming combinatorial histone code that governs accessibility, transcription activation, repression, replication timing and DNA repair without altering fundamental histone DNA wrapping structure.

Ref: Strahl and Allis 2000 Histone Code Hypothesis; Alberts et al., Chapter 4: Histone Tails Site of Modifications

View Details
Cancer

Promoter hypermethylation in cancer commonly leads to

Tumor suppressor gene silencing, is consistent with established principles of cell signaling, receptor pharmacology and cellular regulation. Experimental measurements of binding parameters, genetic loss-of-function studies and pharmacological interventions all converge on the same interpretation. Related options address neighboring concepts but do not satisfy the precise criterion stated in the question.

Ref: NCERT Biology Class 11–12 Alberts et al Molecular Biology of the Cell Lodish et al, Molecular Cell Biology Cooper & Hausman, The Cell Abbas et al., Cellular and Molecular Immunology (for immunology sections)

View Details
Cancer

Epigenetic deregulation in cancer includes

All of the above, is consistent with established principles of cell signaling, receptor pharmacology and cellular regulation. Experimental measurements of binding parameters, genetic loss-of-function studies and pharmacological interventions all converge on the same interpretation. Related options address neighboring concepts but do not satisfy the precise criterion stated in the question.

Ref: NCERT Biology Class 11–12 Alberts et al Molecular Biology of the Cell Lodish et al, Molecular Cell Biology Cooper & Hausman, The Cell Abbas et al., Cellular and Molecular Immunology (for immunology sections)

View Details