Skip to content

#de Broglie hypothesis

2 public questions tagged with this topic.

Why do macroscopic objects not exhibit measurable wave-like properties according to de Broglie’s hypothesis?

**De Broglie wavelength** λ = h/p = h/(m v) = h/√(2 m e V) for electron accelerated through V, for V=100 V λ= h/√(2 m e×100)=1.227/√V nm=0.1227 nm, for 50 V 0.173 nm, for particle mass 3.0×10⁻³⁰ kg v=10⁶ m/s λ=6.63×10⁻³⁴/(3×10⁻³⁰×10⁶)=2.21×10⁻¹⁰ m=0.221 nm, inversely proportional to momentum, property inversely proportional to de Broglie wavelength is momentum. The de Broglie wavelength λ = (h/p) is extremely small for macroscopic objects due to their large momentum, making wave effects negligible. Applying E = h f = h c/λ, p = h/λ, K_max = h f - Φ, Φ = h f₀ = h c/λ₀, λ = h/√(2

Ref: NCERT > Physics Book > Dual Nature of Matter > De Broglie Wavelength and Matter Waves

What does the de Broglie hypothesis suggest about the electron in Bohr’s model?

**De Broglie hypothesis** λ = h/p, p=mv momentum, suggests electron as wave, in Bohr model circumference 2πr = n λ, standing wave condition, n wavelengths fit into orbit, for n=6, 6 wavelengths, for n=4, 4 wavelengths, explains quantization of angular momentum L = r p = r h/λ = r h n/(2πr)= n h/2π = n ħ, physical basis for Bohr quantization. De Broglie suggests that electrons exhibit wave-like behavior, forming standing waves in orbits where the circumference is an integer multiple of the wavelength. Using E_n = -13.6/n² eV, r_n = n² a₀, L = n h/2π, R = R₀ A^¹/³, BE = Δm

Ref: NCERT > Physics Book > Atoms and Nuclei > De Broglie Hypothesis and Quantization in Bohr Model