Skip to content
Login Register

#bioremediation

17 public questions tagged with this topic.

Bioremediation

White rot fungi degrade hydrocarbons using:

White rot fungi including Phanerochaete chrysosporium, Trametes versicolor and Pleurotus ostreatus possess unique extracellular oxidative lignin-degrading machinery evolved to depolymerize wood lignin polymer composed of phenylpropanoid units linked via ether and carbon-carbon bonds, which serendipitously attacks structurally similar persistent organic pollutants including benzo[a]pyrene, polychlorinated biphenyls, dioxins and pentachlorophenol. Key enzymes secreted under nutrient nitrogen limitation triggering secondary metabolism are lignin peroxidase LiP isoenzymes oxidizing veratryl alcohol to radical cation with redox potential 1.4 volts capable of abstracting electrons from non-phenolic aromatics, manganese peroxidase MnP oxidizing Mn2+ to Mn3+ chelated by oxalate that diffuses as small reactive oxidizer attacking phenolic structures, and versatile peroxidase VP combining both activities plus laccase using oxygen and mediator ABTS. Generation of highly reactive free radicals leads to non-specific, non-stereoselective oxidative cleavage of C-C and C-O bonds producing quinones that undergo subsequent ring opening. Reactions require hydrogen peroxide continuously supplied by glyoxal oxidase and aryl alcohol oxidase. Because oxidation is extracellular and radical-mediated rather than requiring substrate uptake, white rot fungi degrade high molecular weight PAHs unavailable to bacterial intracellular dioxygenases, explaining superiority for complex hydrocarbon mixtures.

Ref: Pointing White rot fungi role in bioremediation Applied Microbiology Biotechnology 2001; Wesenberg et al. lignin peroxidase mechanism; PubMed PAH fungal.

View Details
Bioremediation

Which microorganism is known to degrade aromatic hydrocarbons?

Pseudomonas putida strains such as KT2440 certified HV1 safety, mt-2 and F1 embody archetypal aerobic degraders of monoaromatic and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons due to extraordinary metabolic versatility conferred by large genome 6.2 megabases encoding more than 80 oxygenases and multiple catabolic plasmids including TOL plasmid pWW0 carrying upper pathway xylCMABN converting toluene and xylene to benzoate via xylene monooxygenase multicomponent system and meta-cleavage lower pathway xylXYZLTEGFJKIH, and NAH7 plasmid encoding naphthalene dioxygenase nahAc. Enzymatic repertoire includes toluene dioxygenase todC1C2BA introducing dioxygen to form cis-dihydrodiols, catechol 2,3-dioxygenase xylE catalyzing extradiol ring fission producing yellow 2-hydroxymuconic semialdehyde, and central tricarboxylic acid cycle integration. Chemotaxis genes che regulate flagellar movement toward aromatic gradients increasing bioavailability. Strain thrives in contaminated soils at densities 10^6 per gram, grows on benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylene as sole carbon sources with generation time 2 to 3 hours. Unlike Escherichia coli lacking oxygenase repertoire, Lactobacillus focusing on sugar fermentation, Streptococcus pathogenic without catabolic plasmids, P. putida evolved in polluted niches possessing regulatory networks XylR and TodST responding to aromatic inducers, enabling rapid mineralization to CO2 with high specific affinity.

Ref: Timmis Pseudomonas putida review Nature Reviews Microbiology 2002; EPA aromatic degraders guide; PubMed KT2440 genome PMID 12055322.

View Details
Bioremediation

Bioreactors used in bioremediation are:

Bioreactors in bioremediation function as engineered controlled systems where dissolved oxygen via sparging, agitation 100 to 500 rpm, pH 6 to 8 via dosing, temperature 20 to 35 Celsius via jackets, retention time 0.5 to 10 days, redox potential via ORP probes, and nutrient supply precisely manipulated via controllers maximizing degradation kinetics modeled by Monod equations. Configurations include stirred-tank slurry reactors 10 to 30 percent solids, packed-bed biofilters with immobilized biofilm for air and water, fluidized beds using sand carriers enhancing retention above 10 g per L, and membrane bioreactors retaining slow dechlorinators. Unlike uncontrolled natural attenuation relying on passive diffusion, open wetlands or root zones fluctuating diurnally, bioreactors provide containment preventing spread, capture off-gases via activated carbon, achieve endpoints within days to weeks. Real-time monitoring via respirometry, chromatography and qPCR of catabolic genes catA informs adaptive control optimizing aeration and feeding, though capital investment and complexity higher than in situ approaches, justifiable for industrial effluents with high contaminant loads.

Ref: Chisti Bioreactors in Waste Management; EPA Bioreactor Design Manual 2002; Wang et al. Bioprocess Engineering principles.

View Details
Bioremediation

Composting as a bioremediation method uses:

Composting as bioremediation modality exploits thermophilic and mesophilic microbial consortia developing during controlled decomposition of organic matter to co-metabolize and mineralize hazardous contaminants such as explosives trinitrotoluene, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, chlorinated pesticides and petroleum hydrocarbons. System typically configured as aerated static windrows or mechanically turned piles where contaminated soil blended at 10 to 30 percent by volume with organic amendments including manure supplying nitrogen, straw providing carbon and structure, wood chips increasing porosity and sewage sludge inoculating diverse populations totaling 10^9 bacteria plus 10^6 fungi per gram comprising Bacillus subtilis, Pseudomonas fluorescens, Actinomycetes Streptomyces and fungi Phanerochaete chrysosporium, Trichoderma harzianum. Process proceeds through initial mesophilic phase 20 to 45 Celsius lasting few days where bacteria hydrolyze polymers releasing heat raising temperature to thermophilic phase 55 to 65 Celsius where extracellular lignin modifying enzymes lignin peroxidase, manganese peroxidase and laccase exhibit enhanced activity toward recalcitrant PAHs via radical generation, plus bacterial dioxygenases intensify. Turning maintains oxygen above 10 percent preventing anaerobiosis. Synergistic bacteria-fungi interactions provide complementary enzyme repertoires: bacteria perform rapid mineralization while fungi attack high molecular weight contaminants extracellularly. Final humified compost contains immobilized residues with toxicity reduction 80 to 95 percent measured via Microtox.

Ref: Williams et al. Compost remediation of explosives 1992; EPA Composting Handbook; PubMed compost bioremediation mechanisms.

View Details
Bioremediation

Land farming is characterized by:

Land farming represents oldest, simplest ex situ bioremediation for oily sludges from refineries and crude pits where biodegradable fraction high. Approach involves excavation, spreading soil in thin layer 30 to 50 cm over lined area with berms preventing runoff, periodic tilling every one to two weeks improving aeration 10-fold, breaking clods and mixing nutrients like urea, diammonium phosphate correcting deficiency. Indigenous degraders Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Arthrobacter, Rhodococcus and Aspergillus carrying alkane hydroxylases and catechol cleavage proliferate 10 to 100 fold oxidizing hydrocarbons aerobically with irrigation moisture. Low energy using farm equipment, solar heating, minimal infrastructure yields costs $30 to 60 per ton versus incineration $300 to 1000 per ton or slurry reactors. Limitations include large land requirement 1 acre per 10,000 tons, volatile emissions requiring BTEX air monitoring, unsuitability for high toxic metal or highly chlorinated solvent soils inhibiting biology, and seasonal dependence on temperature and rainfall limiting year-round operation in temperate zones.

Ref: EPA Landfarming Guidance 1994; Khan et al. Journal Environmental Management 2004 landfarm cost; PubMed low-cost remediation.

View Details
Bioremediation

Biopile technique is an example of:

Biopile technique represents engineered ex situ bioremediation approach combining features of landfarming and composting but under more controlled conditions for petroleum-contaminated soils. Contaminated soil excavated from source zone, homogenized by screening to remove debris, mixed with amendments such as wood chips bulking agents enhancing permeability, fertilizers adjusting C:N:P ratio to 100:10:1, water to maintain 50 to 70 percent water holding capacity, sometimes microbial inocula, and heaped into above-ground mounds 2 to 3 meters high overlying impermeable high-density polyethylene liner with leachate collection drainage and aeration piping connected to blowers supplying oxygen via positive or negative aeration. Contaminant concentration reduced through aerobic metabolic pathways mediated by alkB and catechol dioxygenase bearing bacteria at mesophilic temperatures 20 to 35 Celsius maintained without high thermophilic phase. Performance monitored via temperature probes, oxygen sensors, and chemical analysis of total petroleum hydrocarbons. Classification as ex situ reflects requirement for excavation and relocation; unlike in situ bioventing or biosparging which treat soil in place, biopiles demand material handling, space for construction, emission controls via covering, but remain cost-effective $130 to 300 per ton compared to slurry bioreactors $200 to 600 per ton, achieving cleanup within 3 to 12 months depending on recalcitrance.

Ref: EPA Biopile Design and Operation Manual 1995; Jorgensen et al. Biopile remediation Soil 2010; NCERT ex situ examples.

View Details
Bioremediation

Surfactants enhance bioremediation by increasing:

Hydrophobic organic pollutants including crude oil aliphatic and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, polychlorinated biphenyls and creosote components exhibit low aqueous solubility below 1 mg per L, strong sorption to soil organic matter estimated by high Koc, and presence as non-aqueous phase liquids limiting mass transfer to bacterial cells even when degradative enzymes encoded by alkB and nahAc are present. Addition of biosurfactants such as rhamnolipids composed of rhamnose glycosidically linked to beta-hydroxydecanoic acid from Pseudomonas aeruginosa, surfactin cyclic lipopeptide from Bacillus subtilis, or synthetic surfactants Tween 80 and Triton X-100 at concentrations near critical micelle concentration 10 to 200 mg per L lowers surface tension from 72 to 30 milliNewton per meter and interfacial tension, emulsifying oil into micelles 5 to 100 nanometer diameter and pseudo-solubilizing hydrocarbons into aqueous phase, dramatically increasing interfacial area and apparent solubility. This desorption from particles improves direct cell-substrate contact, enhances chemotactic attraction, modulates cell surface hydrophobicity via lipopolysaccharide alteration and increases membrane permeability without necessarily causing lethal lysis at sub-critical micelle doses. Genes rhlAB for rhamnolipid synthesis induced under nitrogen limitation illustrate regulated bioavailability enhancement, measurable as increased CO2 evolution and disappearance of parent compound.

Ref: Pacwa-Płociniczak et al. International Journal Molecular Sciences 2011 biosurfactants bioremediation; EPA surfactant enhanced recovery guide.

View Details
Bioremediation

Which factor does NOT affect bioremediation?

Bioremediation success reflects interplay between microbial physiology and environmental physicochemistry governing enzymatic function, bioavailability and cell growth. Temperature directly influences membrane fluidity, protein folding and reaction rates according to Arrhenius relationship; mesophilic degraders exhibit optimum around 20 to 30 Celsius while psychrophiles slower and thermophiles require elevated energy for dioxygenase stability. pH around 6.5 to 8.0 maintains proton motive force across membrane, optimal ionization of catalytic residues histidine and aspartate in monooxygenase active centers and solubility of nutrients. Oxygen availability determines redox potential between plus 300 mV aerobic and minus 300 mV anaerobic, dictating whether oxygenase-mediated pathways requiring molecular oxygen as cosubstrate for alkB or anaerobic respiratory routes using nitrate, Fe(III) or sulfate dominate. Nutrient supply maintaining C:N:P near 100:10:1, contaminant concentration below toxic threshold, soil texture affecting aeration and moisture holding capacity also influence. Magnetic field strength exerts negligible direct effect on central metabolism, gene expression or electron transport except for magnetotactic bacteria aligning via magnetosomes; no mechanistic link connects geomagnetic flux to catabolic rates, so field strength excluded among determining factors.

Ref: EPA Factors affecting bioremediation 2000; Singh et al. Journal Environmental Biology 2008 environmental parameters; Campbell Ecology.

View Details
Bioremediation

In situ bioremediation involves:

In situ bioremediation treats contamination directly within subsurface without excavation, preserving soil structure, minimizing disturbance to existing infrastructure and reducing expenses linked to transportation plus disposal. Treatment mobilizes indigenous microbes already adapted or introduced augmentative cultures capable of degrading target compounds within aquifer pores or vadose zone voids. Technologies include bioventing delivering low-flow air 1 to 3 cubic feet per minute per well to unsaturated zone to support aerobic oxidation of fuel hydrocarbons via alkane monooxygenase, biosparging injecting air below water table to increase dissolved oxygen up to 8 mg per L for dissolved-phase BTEX, and enhanced anaerobic bioremediation supplying lactate, molasses or emulsified vegetable oil as electron donors stimulating Dehalococcoides mediated reductive dechlorination of trichloroethene to ethene via tceA gene. Intrinsic processes monitored through natural attenuation also classify as in situ. Design requires detailed hydrogeologic characterization of hydraulic conductivity, groundwater velocity, redox zonation, and contaminant distribution to ensure uniform amendment delivery without channeling through high permeability preferential pathways. Although limited by heterogeneity causing inaccessible low permeability lenses, minimal footprint, lower worker exposure and ability to treat large volumes beneath buildings make in situ approach preferred when site conditions allow.

Ref: EPA In Situ Bioremediation Technical Guide 2013; Bouwer & Zehnder Soil bioremediation; PubMed in situ review.

View Details
Bioremediation

Bioremediation is defined as:

Bioremediation encompasses deliberate application of biological agents including bacteria, archaea, fungi and plants to neutralize, transform, degrade or immobilize environmental pollutants, ultimately converting hazardous organics into less harmful end products such as carbon dioxide, water, chloride and inorganic salts. Indigenous genera Pseudomonas, Sphingomonas, Rhodococcus harbor catabolic plasmids TOL encoding toluene degradation, OCT for octane, NAH for naphthalene, and chromosomal genes nahAc non-heme iron dioxygenase, alkB integral membrane alkane hydroxylase, xylE catechol 2,3-dioxygenase that initiate oxidative attack. Mycoremediation using Phanerochaete chrysosporium exploits lignin peroxidase to oxidize recalcitrant polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Unlike chemical precipitation requiring lime addition producing sludge, incineration generating dioxins with high energy cost, or physical removal via excavation, bioremediation exploits natural metabolic pathways under ambient temperature, operates in situ minimizing disturbance or ex situ with control, and can be enhanced via bioaugmentation, biostimulation or engineered strains expressing expanded substrate ranges. Applications span oil spills, chlorinated solvents, heavy metals via biosorption and radionuclides via bioprecipitation, representing sustainable ecosystem restoration strategy.

Ref: EPA Bioremediation overview https://www.epa.gov/remedy/bioremediation; Vidali I J Green Chem 2001; NCERT Environmental Biotechnology.

View Details