Functional removal of undesirable endogenous activity defines subtraction approach. Native genes responsible for fruit softening, browning, lignin deposition, or allergenicity can be downregulated via antisense transcription, RNA interference using hairpin constructs processed into siRNAs, or targeted knockout via CRISPR. Resulting lines lack specific enzyme activity, leading to accumulation of precursors or alternative metabolites. For example antisense polygalacturonase tomatoes retain firmness, and RNAi suppression of polyphenol oxidase reduces bruising in potato. Subtraction does not introduce new enzymatic function but eliminates existing one, complementing addition strategy. Inheritance usually dominant due to transgene encoded silencing signal spreading systemically. Careful design ensures specificity to avoid off-target silencing of related family members. Hence main outcome of subtraction is inactivation of existing plant genes to improve quality, shelf life, or processing attributes without adding foreign protein products. Technology examples include antisense polygalacturonase tomato delaying softening and RNAi mediated non-browning Arctic apple silencing polyphenol oxidase. Small interfering RNAs of 21 nucleotides incorporate into RISC complex guiding cleavage of target transcript. Stable inheritance follows Mendelian ratio, though epigenetic silencing may occur. Gene subtraction therefore complements addition by removing detrimental activities without introducing new metabolic enzymes, improving postharvest quality attributes.
Ref:
Watson Ch 8 silencing; NCBI NBK21471 antisense RNAi subtraction; Lodish Ch 8 inactivation; PubMed 11340117.