Skip to content

#nutrient availability

4 public questions tagged with this topic.

Biomass of primary producers in bottom-up ecosystems is controlled by:

“Abiotic factors and nutrient supply” for biomass of primary producers in bottom-up ecosystems is controlled by. This relationship follows from the ecological mechanism represented by the terms in the item, not merely from an association between their names. Ecosystem processes are constrained by energy conservation and by the cycling of matter. Energy enters mainly through primary production, is lost as metabolic heat at every transfer, and therefore cannot be recycled in the way that carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus, or water can. The remaining alternatives—“Predator abundance”, “Competition”, “Secondary consumers”—refer to different states, processes, or scales and therefore do not express the same causal relationship. The relevant inference should follow the pathway from resource supply to organismal uptake and then to ecosystem-level flux. Productivity, trophic transfer, decomposition, and nutrient regeneration are connected, but each measures a different part of that pathway. Field observations could test this account by measuring the proposed driver and the demographic or ecosystem response while controlling plausible confounding factors.

Ref: Fundamentals of Ecology, Odum & Barrett, 5th Ed., Ch. 4

What controls biomass accumulation in bottom-up control?

“Nutrients and abiotic factors” for what controls biomass accumulation in bottom-up control. This relationship follows from the ecological mechanism represented by the terms in the item, not merely from an association between their names. Rates depend on temperature, moisture, substrate quality, consumer physiology, and the elemental balance between organisms and their food. These controls explain why the same process can differ among terrestrial, freshwater, and marine systems without changing its definition. The remaining alternatives—“Predators”, “Prey populations”, “Carnivores”—refer to different states, processes, or scales and therefore do not express the same causal relationship. Ecosystem processes are constrained by energy conservation and by the cycling of matter. Energy enters mainly through primary production, is lost as metabolic heat at every transfer, and therefore cannot be recycled in the way that carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus, or water can. The cited framing is therefore most useful when treated as a conditional biological claim, with assumptions about scale and environmental context kept explicit.

Ref: Fundamentals of Ecology, Odum & Barrett, 5th Ed., Ch. 4

EDTA and DTPA are examples of:

Chelators (C) is correct here. This is core MINERAL Transport: once you know the definition or pathway step, Chelators is the clear fit. The wrong ones are A) Enzymes; B) Phytohormones; D) Transport proteins. If the topic is about gradients or potentials, water/solutes move from higher to lower of the relevant quantity.

Ref: Best CSIR NET Plant Physiology books: Master Unit 6 with Taiz & Zeiger and Salisbury & Ross. Crack Part C experimental questions with top textbooks.

Chelators help plants by:

Go with C — Keeping metal ions soluble. Under MINERAL Transport, this is the standard explanation you’d use in class: it names the real driver or definition, while the rest are nearby but wrong. Not these: A) Increasing transpiration; B) Preventing ion uptake; D) Converting ions to gases. When two options sound similar, choose the one that matches the textbook definition most tightly.

Ref: Best CSIR NET Plant Physiology books: Master Unit 6 with Taiz & Zeiger and Salisbury & Ross. Crack Part C experimental questions with top textbooks.