Porcupine fish can inflate their bodies and erect prominent spines, making capture and swallowing difficult and potentially injuring a predator. The spines are structural or physical defenses because they directly interfere with handling rather than deceiving the predator about identity or location. Inflation further increases apparent size and causes the spines to project, combining mechanical resistance with intimidation. Camouflage would reduce detection, Batesian mimicry would involve resemblance by an undefended organism to a defended model, and aggressive mimicry would aid an attacker. The defense remains effective even without a model species because its value comes from the fish's own morphology and deployment behavior. The relevant evidence concerns process rather than wording alone. Linking the described pattern to energetic returns, fitness consequences, or receiver responses makes the inference biologically coherent and distinguishes it from the competing alternatives. Ecological categories are simplified models, yet they remain valuable when their assumptions are stated. The selected description captures the dominant net effect, while real systems may vary with density, habitat, life stage, and environmental conditions.
Ref:
Evolutionary Analysis, Herron & Freeman, 5th Ed., Ch. 10