The keyed exception is “High parental care.” In the context of which of these is not a trait of r-strategists, that statement differs from the governing ecological pattern and must be evaluated against the mechanism rather than accepted from wording alone. Life-history traits reflect allocation among growth, maintenance, survival, and reproduction. Energy invested in many offspring cannot simultaneously be invested in large offspring, prolonged care, or future breeding, creating measurable trade-offs. The remaining alternatives—“High dispersal ability”, “High reproductive rate”, “Small body size”—refer to different states, processes, or scales and therefore do not express the same causal relationship. Survivorship curves summarize age-specific mortality: Type I concentrates loss late in life, Type II approximates a constant hazard, and Type III concentrates loss early. They are empirical patterns, not rigid taxonomic rules. This distinction matters because similar surface patterns can arise through different mechanisms, whereas ecological prediction depends on identifying the mechanism that actually changes rates.
Ref:
Ecology: Concepts and Applications, Molles, 9th Ed., Ch. 12