Skip to content
Login Register

#genetic mutation

15 public questions tagged with this topic.

Eye Lens Induction -l

Which condition is caused by mutations in Pax6?

Human PAX6 heterozygous loss-of-function mutations cause aniridia, autosomal dominant condition characterized by near complete absence of iris tissue, foveal hypoplasia, cataract and corneal pannus. During development, reduced Pax6 dosage impairs maintenance of optic cup rim that generates iris stroma and pigmented epithelium, as well as surface ectoderm differentiation into corneal epithelium. Patient limbal stem cells fail to maintain transparency. Mouse small-eye heterozygotes parallel phenotype. Aniridia demonstrates critical role for precise Pax6 levels in anterior segment development beyond early lens induction, making it classic example of haploinsufficiency in eye disease.

Ref: Ton et al. Cell 1991; Gilbert Developmental Biology 12th ed., Chapter 19: PAX6 mutations cause aniridia.

View Details
Limb Development -lll

Which mutation leads to human polysyndactyly (fusion of extra digits)?

Human synpolydactyly type II results from HoxD13 polyalanine tract expansion mutations within N-terminal coding region affecting transcription. HoxD13 normally patterns distal autopod, regulates digit number, length and interdigital separation by modulating BMP antagonists and Ephrin signaling at digit tips. Expanded tract causes protein aggregation, dominant negative interference with other Hox13 proteins, leading to defective interdigital BMP signaling, persistent soft-tissue webbing and extra fused digits with brachydactyly. TBX5 causes Holt-Oram syndrome, HoxA11 affects zeugopod, Lmx1b causes nail-patella syndrome. Hence HoxD13 links to polysyndactyly.

Ref: Muragaki et al., Science 1996, Gilbert Chapter 20: HoxD13 mutations and synpolydactyly.

View Details
Tetrapod

Which HOX gene mutation is associated with human polysyndactyly (fusion of extra digits)?

HOXD13 is distal HoxA/D cluster member essential for autopod patterning, digit number, joint and interdigital separation. Polyalanine tract expansions, missense mutations altering homeodomain DNA binding disrupt downstream targets regulating BMP antagonism, interdigital apoptosis, and chondrogenic condensations. Resulting phenotype is synpolydactyly characterized by duplication and fusion of central digits, often with syndactyly. Mouse Hoxd13 knockouts show similar autopod defects, human pedigrees exhibit autosomal dominant inheritance with variable expressivity, confirming dosage-sensitive requirement of this transcription factor in distal limb morphogenesis and digit specification.

Ref: Gilbert, Developmental Biology, 12th ed., Chapter 19: HOXD13 mutation and human synpolydactyly.

View Details
sex determination-ll

XX mammals lacking Wnt4 exhibit:

Wnt4 indispensably maintains ovarian identity in XX mammals; its absence causes masculinization. Knockout XX mice display perinatal partial sex reversal with testis-like coelomic vessel development, ectopic steroidogenic cells synthesizing testosterone, persistence of Wolffian duct remnants, reduction of Müllerian ducts due to reduced Fst, and transdifferentiation of granulosa precursors. Germ cell meiosis entry fails, follicles deplete resembling polycystic phenotype. Human WNT4 mutations associate with androgen excess and absence of Müllerian structures. Phenotype reflects derepression of Sox9/Fgf9 male program when Wnt4/β-catenin antagonism removed.

Ref: NCBI, Wnt4 knockout phenotype - masculinized XX gonads; Gilbert Chapter 6 Ovarian maintenance.

View Details
Dictyostelium

Trishanku (triA) mutation results in:

Trishanku or triA gene named after mythologically suspended king encodes protein involved in cell adhesion and tip formation. Mutants complete early aggregation forming mounds but arrest at mound-to-finger transition, unable to initiate culmination. Tip organizer fails to produce cellulose sheath and lacks proper extracellular matrix deposition, so slugs do not erect. Hence phenotype is described as no culmination rather than no slug or multiple stalks. Early culmination would require premature activation, opposite to observed arrest. Molecular analyses suggest TriA influences cytoskeletal organization and tip-specific gene expression required for vertical growth and prestalk-to-stalk conversion during fruiting body morphogenesis.

Ref: Development, TriA/trishanku mutant - adhesion defects and failure to initiate culmination without tip organization.

View Details
Protein Sorting and Trafficking

Which mutation is associated with Familial Hypercholesterolemia (FH)?

Familial hypercholesterolemia prototypical autosomal co-dominant hyperlipidemia illustrating receptor-mediated endocytosis studied Brown Goldstein Nobel 1985 award. Clinical features elevated plasma LDL two to three fold heterozygotes six fold homozygotes tendon xanthomas cholesterol deposition xanthelasma corneal arcus premature atherosclerotic coronary disease often teens homozygotes severe. Molecular lesion mutations LDLR gene locus 19p13.2 encoding 860 aa receptor 18 exons. Over 2000 pathogenic variants classified five classes: class 1 null no synthesis, class 2 transport defective ER retention, class 3 binding defective LA repeat, class 4 internalization defective NPXY tail or ARH adaptor, class 5 recycling defective. Heterozygote prevalence 1 in 220, homozygote 1 in 300k to million. Pathway failure prevents hepatic uptake increasing circulating LDL cholesterol. Transferrin receptor mutations affect iron metabolism anemia, Hsp70 influences folding general, dynamin impairs vesicle scission not cholesterol specifically. Identification LDLR clarified endocytic regulation feedback via SREBP controlling HMG-CoA reductase and PCSK9 therapeutic target evolocumab relevant cardiology metabolism and genetics and personalized medicine.

Ref: Genetics Home Reference, Familial Hypercholesterolemia: LDLR mutations on 19p13.2 cause FH.

View Details
MOLECULAR EVOLUTION

Which mutation introduces a stop codon?

Nonsense reflects key principle in quiz on molecular evolution, where evolutionary mechanisms shape genetic variation and adaptation. In this context, Nonsense aligns with experimental and theoretical evidence from population genetics, behavioral ecology and molecular phylogeny. Textbooks like Campbell Biology, Futuyma Evolution and Hartl Principles illustrate supporting data. Understanding why Nonsense fits helps integrate natural selection, environment.

Ref: Li, Molecular Evolution, Neutral Theory and Molecular Clocks.

View Details
Mutation and Mutagenesis

Transversion mutation involves

Transversion mutation substitutes purine for pyrimidine or vice versa, for example A→C, A→T, G→C, G→T and reciprocal changes, involving interconversion of double-ring and single-ring structures. This creates larger geometric distortion than transition, often triggering repair recognition yet when fixed causes more dramatic chemical change. Transversions can result from oxidative damage generating 8-oxo-guanine pairing with adenine or from alkylation products. Their occurrence produces stronger effects on protein coding due to greater likelihood of non-conservative amino acid replacement. This principle illustrates essential molecular mechanisms governing replication fidelity and mutation fixation relevant for exam interpretation.

Ref: Lehninger Principles of Biochemistry, 8th ed., Chapter 8: Transversion Base Substitutions and Structural Distortion

View Details
Mutation and Mutagenesis

Transition mutation involves

Transition mutation is subtype of base substitution where a purine is replaced by remaining purine (A↔G) or pyrimidine by remaining pyrimidine (C↔T), preserving ring type. Such changes arise from tautomeric mispairing and deamination events, for instance deamination of 5-methylcytosine producing thymine. Because purine-pyrimidine axis stays similar, helical distortion is minimal and lesions often escape detection by repair surveillance, leading to higher spontaneous frequency than transversions and influencing codon degeneracy patterns observed in molecular evolution. This principle illustrates essential molecular mechanisms governing replication fidelity and mutation fixation relevant for exam interpretation.

Ref: Lodish et al., Molecular Cell Biology, 9th ed., Chapter 9: Transition Mutations Purine-to-Purine

View Details
Mutation and Mutagenesis

Mutagenesis refers to

Mutagenesis describes the dynamic process by which mutations originate in genome, encompassing both spontaneous and induced pathways. Spontaneous mutagenesis stems from intrinsic errors such as polymerase misincorporation, rare tautomeric shifts altering pairing, hydrolytic depurination and deamination, and oxidative damage from cellular metabolism. Induced mutagenesis results from exogenous physical agents like ultraviolet radiation or chemical agents such as alkylating agents, base analogs, and intercalators that increase lesion frequency. Understanding mutagenesis focuses on lesion formation and fixation during replication. This principle illustrates essential molecular mechanisms governing replication fidelity and mutation fixation relevant for exam interpretation.

Ref: Watson et al., Molecular Biology of the Gene, 7th ed., Chapter 10: Mechanisms of Spontaneous and Induced Mutagenesis

View Details
Hybridization

What is the main objective of in vitro mutagenesis?

In vitro mutagenesis is a reverse genetics strategy aimed at generating defined nucleotide changes in cloned genes to investigate relationship between protein primary structure and biological function. By altering specific codons corresponding to active site residues, binding motifs, or structural domains, researchers evaluate effects on catalysis, stability, interaction, or localization. Results link sequence to function, guiding enzyme mechanism analysis and rational protein engineering. Objective is not to measure transcription rate, discover unknown genes randomly, or simply amplify DNA. Controlled mutagenesis provides mechanistic insights central to molecular biology, biochemistry, and biotechnology applications.

Ref: NCERT Biology Class XII Principles on Klenow fill-in labeling, Lehninger Chapter 9 DNA cloning techniques, and Molecular Cloning by Sambrook Chapter 10 documenting end-labeling of cohesive termini.

View Details