Practice question

The keyed exception is “Show early semelparity.” In the context of which of the following is false regarding k-selected species, that statement differs from the governing ecological pattern and must be evaluated against the mechanism rather than accepted from wording alone. Mechanistic support comes from showing how resource limitation, enemies, mate availability, or physiological stress changes demographic performance. A descriptive association alone does not establish regulation or causation. The remaining alternatives—“Low reproductive rate”, “High parental investment”, “Thrive in stable environments”—refer to different states, processes, or scales and therefore do not express the same causal relationship. Population ecology links individual births, deaths, immigration, and emigration to changes in abundance. Per-capita rates determine the direction of change, while density dependence creates feedback when crowding alters survival or reproduction. Field observations could test this account by measuring the proposed driver and the demographic or ecosystem response while controlling plausible confounding factors. This distinction matters because similar surface patterns can arise through different mechanisms, whereas ecological prediction depends on identifying the mechanism that actually changes rates.