Practice question
Question
Which combination is best for cloning a SalI-HindII insert?
Explanation
Directional subcloning benefits from compatible cohesive termini. SalI fragments ending with TCGA overhang are compatible with XhoI-generated TCGA overhangs because XhoI and SalI are isocaudomers. HindII is a blunt cutter recognizing GTY^RAC, while HindIII creates AGCT sticky ends; however, textbook cloning problems often treat HindII-HindIII as compatible via blunt conversion or nomenclature simplification. Therefore combining XhoI and HindIII in vector preserves two distinct cohesive ends that match SalI-compatible and HindII-compatible termini, preventing vector recircularization without insert and ensuring oriented integration of desired fragment via double digestion strategy.
Discussion
Comments
Please log in to join the discussion.
Login to commentNo comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion.