Practice question
Question
Forest patches are embedded within a landscape dominated by crop fields. The crop fields around fragmented forest patches are thought to affect the abundance of different butterfly species to different extents. The graph below shows the pattern of butterfly abundance (means, and error bars representing 95% confidence intervals) of three species, M, N, and O between the forest patches and the crop fields. [Formula] Which one of the following options best describes the impact of fragmentation on the three different butterfly species? Forest patches are embedded within a landscape dominated by crop fields. The crop fields around fragmented forest patches are thought to affect the abundance of different butterfly species to different extents. The graph below shows the pattern of butterfly abundance (means, and error bars representing 95% confidence intervals) of three species, M, N, and O between the forest patches and the crop fields. [Formula] Which one of the following options best describes the impact of fragmentation on the three different butterfly species?
Explanation
M – strongly negative, n – weakly negative, o – strongly positive is correct for forest patches are embedded within. In forest patches are embedded within a landscape d ending different butterfly species involving are embedded within a landscape from. Distractors M – strongly positive, N – weakly negative, O – strongly neg are wrong for are embedded within a. Authentic text Cain presents are embedded within a landscape involving M – strongly negative, with visuals that make forest patches.
Discussion
Comments
Please log in to join the discussion.
Login to commentNo comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion.