#island biogeography

Biogeography Complete

Increase in island distance primarily affects:

“Immigration rate” for increase in island distance primarily affects. This relationship follows from the ecological mechanism represented by the terms in the item, not merely from an association between their names. Larger islands usually support more habitats and larger populations, lowering extinction risk; less isolated islands receive colonists more readily and may experience rescue effects. These mechanisms also apply to habitat fragments that function as ecological islands. The remaining alternatives—“Extinction rate”, “Resource availability”, “Genetic drift”—refer to different states, processes, or scales and therefore do not express the same causal relationship. At equilibrium, species identities can continue to turn over even when richness is approximately stable. The model predicts a balance of rates, not an absence of colonization or extinction. Field observations could test this account by measuring the proposed driver and the demographic or ecosystem response while controlling plausible confounding factors. This distinction matters because similar surface patterns can arise through different mechanisms, whereas ecological prediction depends on identifying the mechanism that actually changes rates.

Ref: Biogeography, Lomolino et al., 5th Ed., Ch. 5-8

View Details

Biogeography Complete

Why are larger islands expected to have more species?

“Reduced extinction rates” for why are larger islands expected to have more species. This relationship follows from the ecological mechanism represented by the terms in the item, not merely from an association between their names. Larger islands usually support more habitats and larger populations, lowering extinction risk; less isolated islands receive colonists more readily and may experience rescue effects. These mechanisms also apply to habitat fragments that function as ecological islands. The remaining alternatives—“High predation pressures”, “Limited resources”, “Less immigration”—refer to different states, processes, or scales and therefore do not express the same causal relationship. At equilibrium, species identities can continue to turn over even when richness is approximately stable. The model predicts a balance of rates, not an absence of colonization or extinction. The cited framing is therefore most useful when treated as a conditional biological claim, with assumptions about scale and environmental context kept explicit.

Ref: Biogeography, Lomolino et al., 5th Ed., Ch. 5-8

View Details

Biogeography Complete

Intersection of immigration and extinction curves represents:

“Equilibrium number of species” for intersection of immigration and extinction curves represents. This relationship follows from the ecological mechanism represented by the terms in the item, not merely from an association between their names. Larger islands usually support more habitats and larger populations, lowering extinction risk; less isolated islands receive colonists more readily and may experience rescue effects. These mechanisms also apply to habitat fragments that function as ecological islands. The remaining alternatives—“Total extinction”, “Maximum immigration rate”, “Minimum species number”—refer to different states, processes, or scales and therefore do not express the same causal relationship. At equilibrium, species identities can continue to turn over even when richness is approximately stable. The model predicts a balance of rates, not an absence of colonization or extinction. Linking the wording to measurable consequences for fitness, abundance, or flux gives the conclusion its scientific meaning and prevents a purely mnemonic interpretation.

Ref: Biogeography, Lomolino et al., 5th Ed., Ch. 5-8

View Details

Biogeography Complete

Which scenario reflects the greatest species richness?

“Large island close to mainland” for which scenario reflects the greatest species richness. This relationship follows from the ecological mechanism represented by the terms in the item, not merely from an association between their names. Island biogeography explains species richness as a dynamic balance between immigration and extinction. Immigration generally declines as an island fills with species, whereas extinction rises as more species divide finite area and maintain smaller populations. The remaining alternatives—“Small island close to mainland”, “Large island far from mainland”, “Small island far from mainland”—refer to different states, processes, or scales and therefore do not express the same causal relationship. Larger islands usually support more habitats and larger populations, lowering extinction risk; less isolated islands receive colonists more readily and may experience rescue effects. These mechanisms also apply to habitat fragments that function as ecological islands. The cited framing is therefore most useful when treated as a conditional biological claim, with assumptions about scale and environmental context kept explicit.

Ref: Biogeography, Lomolino et al., 5th Ed., Ch. 5-8

View Details

Biogeography Complete

Wilson’s work on island biogeography helped explain:

“Uneven distribution of species” for wilson’s work on island biogeography helped explain. This relationship follows from the ecological mechanism represented by the terms in the item, not merely from an association between their names. At equilibrium, species identities can continue to turn over even when richness is approximately stable. The model predicts a balance of rates, not an absence of colonization or extinction. The remaining alternatives—“Genetic mutations”, “Even distribution of species”, “Population growth rates”—refer to different states, processes, or scales and therefore do not express the same causal relationship. Island biogeography explains species richness as a dynamic balance between immigration and extinction. Immigration generally declines as an island fills with species, whereas extinction rises as more species divide finite area and maintain smaller populations. The cited framing is therefore most useful when treated as a conditional biological claim, with assumptions about scale and environmental context kept explicit.

Ref: Biogeography, Lomolino et al., 5th Ed., Ch. 5-8

View Details

Biogeography Complete

Immigration rates are primarily influenced by island:

“Distance from mainland” for immigration rates are primarily influenced by island. This relationship follows from the ecological mechanism represented by the terms in the item, not merely from an association between their names. Island biogeography explains species richness as a dynamic balance between immigration and extinction. Immigration generally declines as an island fills with species, whereas extinction rises as more species divide finite area and maintain smaller populations. The remaining alternatives—“Vegetation type”, “Altitude”, “Climate”—refer to different states, processes, or scales and therefore do not express the same causal relationship. Larger islands usually support more habitats and larger populations, lowering extinction risk; less isolated islands receive colonists more readily and may experience rescue effects. These mechanisms also apply to habitat fragments that function as ecological islands. Linking the wording to measurable consequences for fitness, abundance, or flux gives the conclusion its scientific meaning and prevents a purely mnemonic interpretation.

Ref: Biogeography, Lomolino et al., 5th Ed., Ch. 5-8

View Details

Biogeography Complete

Equilibrium theory is another name for:

“Island biogeography theory” for equilibrium theory is another name for. This relationship follows from the ecological mechanism represented by the terms in the item, not merely from an association between their names. Larger islands usually support more habitats and larger populations, lowering extinction risk; less isolated islands receive colonists more readily and may experience rescue effects. These mechanisms also apply to habitat fragments that function as ecological islands. The remaining alternatives—“Genetic drift theory”, “Evolutionary theory”, “Dispersal theory”—refer to different states, processes, or scales and therefore do not express the same causal relationship. At equilibrium, species identities can continue to turn over even when richness is approximately stable. The model predicts a balance of rates, not an absence of colonization or extinction. The cited framing is therefore most useful when treated as a conditional biological claim, with assumptions about scale and environmental context kept explicit. Linking the wording to measurable consequences for fitness, abundance, or flux gives the conclusion its scientific meaning and prevents a purely mnemonic interpretation.

Ref: Biogeography, Lomolino et al., 5th Ed., Ch. 5-8

View Details

Biogeography Complete

In the context of island biogeography, colonization refers specifically to:

“New species entering an island” for in the context of island biogeography, colonization refers specifically to. This relationship follows from the ecological mechanism represented by the terms in the item, not merely from an association between their names. Island biogeography explains species richness as a dynamic balance between immigration and extinction. Immigration generally declines as an island fills with species, whereas extinction rises as more species divide finite area and maintain smaller populations. The remaining alternatives—“Population decline”, “Species extinction”, “Genetic drift”—refer to different states, processes, or scales and therefore do not express the same causal relationship. Larger islands usually support more habitats and larger populations, lowering extinction risk; less isolated islands receive colonists more readily and may experience rescue effects. These mechanisms also apply to habitat fragments that function as ecological islands. The cited framing is therefore most useful when treated as a conditional biological claim, with assumptions about scale and environmental context kept explicit.

Ref: Biogeography, Lomolino et al., 5th Ed., Ch. 5-8

View Details

Biogeography Complete

Larger islands tend to have lower extinction rates because they have:

“More available resources” for larger islands tend to have lower extinction rates because they have. This relationship follows from the ecological mechanism represented by the terms in the item, not merely from an association between their names. Larger islands usually support more habitats and larger populations, lowering extinction risk; less isolated islands receive colonists more readily and may experience rescue effects. These mechanisms also apply to habitat fragments that function as ecological islands. The remaining alternatives—“More competition”, “Higher immigration rates”, “Less species diversity”—refer to different states, processes, or scales and therefore do not express the same causal relationship. At equilibrium, species identities can continue to turn over even when richness is approximately stable. The model predicts a balance of rates, not an absence of colonization or extinction. Field observations could test this account by measuring the proposed driver and the demographic or ecosystem response while controlling plausible confounding factors.

Ref: Biogeography, Lomolino et al., 5th Ed., Ch. 5-8

View Details

Biogeography Complete

A populated island typically has:

“Low immigration and high extinction” for a populated island typically has. This relationship follows from the ecological mechanism represented by the terms in the item, not merely from an association between their names. Larger islands usually support more habitats and larger populations, lowering extinction risk; less isolated islands receive colonists more readily and may experience rescue effects. These mechanisms also apply to habitat fragments that function as ecological islands. The remaining alternatives—“High immigration and low extinction”, “Low immigration and low extinction”, “High immigration and high extinction”—refer to different states, processes, or scales and therefore do not express the same causal relationship. At equilibrium, species identities can continue to turn over even when richness is approximately stable. The model predicts a balance of rates, not an absence of colonization or extinction. Linking the wording to measurable consequences for fitness, abundance, or flux gives the conclusion its scientific meaning and prevents a purely mnemonic interpretation.

Ref: Biogeography, Lomolino et al., 5th Ed., Ch. 5-8

View Details

Biogeography Complete

Mainland, in the context of island biogeography, is defined as:

“Initial habitat of immigrant species” for mainland, in the context of island biogeography, is defined as. This relationship follows from the ecological mechanism represented by the terms in the item, not merely from an association between their names. At equilibrium, species identities can continue to turn over even when richness is approximately stable. The model predicts a balance of rates, not an absence of colonization or extinction. The remaining alternatives—“Nearby islands”, “Mountain tops”, “Desert habitats”—refer to different states, processes, or scales and therefore do not express the same causal relationship. Island biogeography explains species richness as a dynamic balance between immigration and extinction. Immigration generally declines as an island fills with species, whereas extinction rises as more species divide finite area and maintain smaller populations. The cited framing is therefore most useful when treated as a conditional biological claim, with assumptions about scale and environmental context kept explicit.

Ref: Biogeography, Lomolino et al., 5th Ed., Ch. 5-8

View Details

Biogeography Complete

Why does a new, empty island initially have low extinction rates?

“Abundant resources and low competition” for why does a new, empty island initially have low extinction rates. This relationship follows from the ecological mechanism represented by the terms in the item, not merely from an association between their names. At equilibrium, species identities can continue to turn over even when richness is approximately stable. The model predicts a balance of rates, not an absence of colonization or extinction. The remaining alternatives—“High competition”, “High predation pressure”, “Small space”—refer to different states, processes, or scales and therefore do not express the same causal relationship. Island biogeography explains species richness as a dynamic balance between immigration and extinction. Immigration generally declines as an island fills with species, whereas extinction rises as more species divide finite area and maintain smaller populations. The cited framing is therefore most useful when treated as a conditional biological claim, with assumptions about scale and environmental context kept explicit.

Ref: Biogeography, Lomolino et al., 5th Ed., Ch. 5-8

View Details