Skip to content

#ecosystem engineers

2 public questions tagged with this topic.

A species causing ecosystem changes despite being few in number is classified as a:

“Keystone species” for a species causing ecosystem changes despite being few in number is classified as a. This relationship follows from the ecological mechanism represented by the terms in the item, not merely from an association between their names. Ecosystem processes are constrained by energy conservation and by the cycling of matter. Energy enters mainly through primary production, is lost as metabolic heat at every transfer, and therefore cannot be recycled in the way that carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus, or water can. The remaining alternatives—“Dominant species”, “Invasive species”, “Indicator species”—refer to different states, processes, or scales and therefore do not express the same causal relationship. The relevant inference should follow the pathway from resource supply to organismal uptake and then to ecosystem-level flux. Productivity, trophic transfer, decomposition, and nutrient regeneration are connected, but each measures a different part of that pathway. This distinction matters because similar surface patterns can arise through different mechanisms, whereas ecological prediction depends on identifying the mechanism that actually changes rates.

Ref: NCERT Biology Class 12, Ch. 15 Biodiversity and Conservation

Species having disproportionally large effects relative to their biomass are called:

“Keystone species” for species having disproportionally large effects relative to their biomass are called. This relationship follows from the ecological mechanism represented by the terms in the item, not merely from an association between their names. A sound explanation connects the stated pattern to a causal pathway and distinguishes it from alternatives that describe different levels of organization or different ecological processes. The remaining alternatives—“Dominant species”, “Specialist species”, “Indicator species”—refer to different states, processes, or scales and therefore do not express the same causal relationship. Ecological interpretation requires separating the immediate process from its broader consequence. A mechanism operating through physiology or behavior can scale up to alter survival, reproduction, abundance, distribution, and community structure. Linking the wording to measurable consequences for fitness, abundance, or flux gives the conclusion its scientific meaning and prevents a purely mnemonic interpretation. Field observations could test this account by measuring the proposed driver and the demographic or ecosystem response while controlling plausible confounding factors.

Ref: NCERT Biology Class 12, Ch. 15 Biodiversity and Conservation