Skip to content

#ecosystem development

10 public questions tagged with this topic.

Which of the following is true of primary succession?

Primary succession begins where a biological legacy and developed soil are absent, as on new lava, exposed bedrock, or recently deglaciated substrate. Colonists must initiate weathering and organic-matter accumulation before a deeper soil and more demanding vascular plants can become established. Successional trajectories emerge from dispersal, establishment, species interactions, and organism-driven environmental change. Priority effects can make arrival order important, while retained soil and propagules strongly accelerate recovery after disturbance. Facilitation, tolerance, and inhibition are alternative mechanisms rather than mandatory universal stages; more than one may operate at the same site or at different times. The eventual assemblage also depends on climate, substrate, disturbance frequency, and the regional species pool, so a climax is better viewed as dynamic persistence than permanent equilibrium. In this context, the keyed term, Occurs on bare rock or lifeless area, identifies the relevant mechanism or quantitative relationship and links the observed pattern to its underlying ecological cause.

Ref: Ecology: Concepts and Applications, Molles, 9th Ed., Ch. 20

Which of the following defines ecological succession?

Ecological succession is directional change in community composition and structure through time, often following formation of new habitat or disturbance. Colonization, local extinction, environmental modification, and species interactions cause one assemblage to replace another; ordinary seasonal fluctuations do not constitute this long-term sequence. Classical succession terminology divides community development into site exposure, arrival, establishment, interaction, environmental reaction, and relative stabilization. Modern ecology treats these as useful descriptions rather than a rigid deterministic program. Local resource conditions, dispersal limitation, life-history trade-offs, herbivory, pathogens, and stochastic events jointly determine which species replace others. Early species often grow rapidly under open conditions, whereas later species commonly persist under lower resources, but the precise pattern varies among ecosystems and disturbance regimes. In this context, the keyed term, Sequential change in species composition over time, identifies the relevant mechanism or quantitative relationship and links the observed pattern to its underlying ecological cause. The distinction is testable by measuring changes in organisms, resources, or process rates through time rather than relying on the label alone.

Ref: Ecology: Concepts and Applications, Molles, 9th Ed., Ch. 20

Which ecological change is least reversible?

Extinction is effectively irreversible because it eliminates the last living members of a species and therefore its unique evolutionary lineage and gene pool. Once no viable individuals or preserved reproductive material remain, ordinary ecological processes cannot recreate that species. Evolution might eventually produce organisms with similar traits, but not the same historical lineage. Succession can reverse or restart after disturbance, invasion can sometimes be controlled or eradicated, and evolutionary change may be altered by future selection or gene flow, though none is always easily reversible. Extinction therefore represents the strongest permanent loss among the choices. Its ecological effects may cascade when the vanished species was a pollinator, predator, ecosystem engineer, or dominant producer. Local extinction can sometimes be reversed by recolonization or reintroduction from another population; global extinction cannot. Cryopreserved cells or seeds complicate the boundary if viable material remains, but most extinct species lack such reserves. The loss of all reproducing individuals is the biological mechanism making extinction qualitatively less reversible than changes in community composition.

Ref: Ecology: Concepts and Applications, Molles, 9th Ed., Ch. 20

The process of succession is driven by:

Species interactions are major drivers of succession because organisms change both the physical environment and one another’s probability of establishment and survival. Pioneer plants may facilitate successors by building soil, adding nitrogen, or providing shade. Residents may instead inhibit newcomers through competition, allelopathy, or occupation of space. In tolerance pathways, later species establish independently but ultimately prevail because they survive low light or resources better. Herbivory, predation, mutualism, and decomposition also redirect trajectories. The keyed choice highlights this biotic mechanism, but succession is not driven by interactions alone. Disturbance creates or resets sites, dispersal determines which species arrive, and abiotic conditions filter which can persist; the workbook itself later recognizes this fuller combination. Mutation and evolution can influence traits over longer periods, while “migration only” omits establishment filters and local dynamics. Therefore, species interactions are the best offered driver, provided they are understood as operating with disturbance, dispersal, and environmental constraints rather than as an exclusive cause.

Ref: Ecology: Concepts and Applications, Molles, 9th Ed., Ch. 20

A pond gradually turning into a forest is an example of:

A pond progressing toward marsh, meadow, shrubland, and eventually forest under a suitable climate is the classic hydrosere or hydrarch succession. Aquatic plants and phytoplankton add organic matter, while incoming mineral sediment is trapped by vegetation. Decomposition is incomplete in waterlogged conditions, so the basin gradually fills and becomes shallower. Submerged plants give way to floating and emergent vegetation, then sedges, grasses, shrubs, and terrestrial trees as soil aeration improves. Primary succession describes establishment where a prior soil community is absent and can include a hydrosere, but it does not specify the water-to-land direction. Secondary succession starts after disturbance where soil remains. Xerarch succession begins in dry conditions, often on bare rock or sand, and follows the opposite moisture context. Pond infilling is not inevitable: floods, dredging, water-level changes, or stable basin morphology can maintain open water. Nevertheless, the defining mechanism is terrestrialization driven by sediment and organic accumulation, which makes “hydrarch succession” the specific name for this sequence.

Ref: Ecology: Concepts and Applications, Molles, 9th Ed., Ch. 20

The strategy of ecosystem development by Odum emphasizes that:

Odum’s classic strategy of ecosystem development proposes that nutrient cycles become increasingly closed, or “tighter,” as succession proceeds. Early communities have small nutrient pools in biomass, weak retention, and relatively large losses through runoff or leaching. As vegetation, roots, decomposers, and soil organic matter develop, nutrients released by decomposition are captured more efficiently and reused within the community. Longer food chains and greater biological regulation can further slow their escape. Mature systems therefore tend to conserve limiting elements, although disturbance can abruptly reopen cycles. The model also predicts rising biomass, structural complexity, and diversity, not decreases. Early stages are commonly associated with rapidly reproducing, dispersive species, whereas later stages favour more competitive and persistent strategies. Total entropy production is not summarized by a simple statement that entropy merely increases with time. Odum’s scheme is an idealized set of tendencies rather than a universal law; actual trajectories depend on climate, soils, and disturbance. Still, improved internal nutrient retention directly explains why tighter cycling is the expected developmental trend.

Ref: Ecology: Concepts and Applications, Molles, 9th Ed., Ch. 20

Which of these increases during ecological succession?

Species diversity often increases during ecological succession as habitat structure becomes more complex and additional niches develop. Pioneer communities contain relatively few stress-tolerant colonists. Their growth modifies light, temperature, soil, moisture, and organic matter, allowing new plants, decomposers, herbivores, predators, and mutualists to establish. Diversity may later level off or even decline if strong competitors exclude earlier species, so the trend is not universally monotonic. Biomass also usually increases as vegetation accumulates, which makes this item ambiguous because both species diversity and biomass can rise through much of succession. Gross productivity often increases initially as leaf area develops, whereas net ecosystem production tends to peak earlier and decline as maintenance respiration grows. The keyed emphasis on species diversity reflects a standard textbook generalization, but biomass is also scientifically defensible among the provided choices. A precise question would specify which ecosystem attribute, successional interval, or single-best convention is intended. The mechanistic basis for the diversity trend is progressive habitat modification and greater structural and trophic complexity.

Ref: Ecology: Concepts and Applications, Molles, 9th Ed., Ch. 20