Skip to content

#filament dynamics

2 public questions tagged with this topic.

Which protein caps the barbed (+) end of actin filaments, preventing further polymerization?

Length control at barbed end requires high affinity cappers preventing subunit addition. CapZ, known as capping protein CP alpha1 or alpha2 beta heterodimer, is major ubiquitous capper in mammals. Biochemical analysis shows binding Kd near 0.1 nanomolar, essentially irreversible without regulation. Crystal structure reveals mushroom shaped dimer where alpha subunit C terminal amphipathic helix binds hydrophobic pocket of ultimate actin subunit and beta subunit tentacle contacts penultimate subunit, sterically blocking monomer entry. In sarcomeres CapZ anchors thin filament plus end at Z disc line via interaction with nebulin and alpha actinin, maintaining thin filament length. In non muscle cells CapZ caps majority of free barbed ends, funneling polymerization to few uncapped ends created during signaling. Regulation involves PIP2 binding reducing affinity and CPI motif proteins CARMIL CD2AP and CKIP that allosterically uncap. Tropomyosin decorates sides stabilizing against cofilin, tropomodulin caps pointed ends, thymosin beta4 sequesters monomers, hence role of blocking further polymerization at plus end uniquely belongs to CapZ capping complex.

Ref: Pollard and Earnshaw, Cell Biology, Chapter 12: Capping Proteins CapZ and Barbed End Regulation.

The critical concentration (Cc) of actin filaments is defined as the concentration at which:

Assembly of G actin into F actin follows reversible nucleation condensation kinetics characterized by critical concentration. Defined as monomer concentration at which rate of subunit addition equals rate of loss at filament ends, Cc reflects equilibrium constant Kd equal to k off divided by k on. Experimental determination uses pyrene fluorescence plateau where increasing total actin beyond Cc goes into polymer, free monomer stays constant. Because barbed plus end and pointed minus end have distinct kinetic constants due to ATP versus ADP actin states, each end possesses its own Cc approximately 0.1 micromolar for barbed and 0.8 micromolar for pointed under physiological 50 millimolar KCl 2 millimolar MgCl2. Between these values treadmilling operates, barbed elongates while pointed shrinks, net polymer constant. Complete depolymerization requires dropping below both Cc values or adding sequestering drugs like latrunculin. Branch angle 70 degrees relates to Arp2/3 geometry not Cc, and ATP hydrolysis rate is consequence not definition. Understanding Cc enables prediction of growth versus shrinkage and design of polymerization assays.

Ref: Pollard and Earnshaw, Cell Biology, Chapter 12: Actin Polymerization and Critical Concentration.