Skip to content

#barbed end

2 public questions tagged with this topic.

Which protein caps the barbed (+) end of actin filaments, preventing further polymerization?

Length control at barbed end requires high affinity cappers preventing subunit addition. CapZ, known as capping protein CP alpha1 or alpha2 beta heterodimer, is major ubiquitous capper in mammals. Biochemical analysis shows binding Kd near 0.1 nanomolar, essentially irreversible without regulation. Crystal structure reveals mushroom shaped dimer where alpha subunit C terminal amphipathic helix binds hydrophobic pocket of ultimate actin subunit and beta subunit tentacle contacts penultimate subunit, sterically blocking monomer entry. In sarcomeres CapZ anchors thin filament plus end at Z disc line via interaction with nebulin and alpha actinin, maintaining thin filament length. In non muscle cells CapZ caps majority of free barbed ends, funneling polymerization to few uncapped ends created during signaling. Regulation involves PIP2 binding reducing affinity and CPI motif proteins CARMIL CD2AP and CKIP that allosterically uncap. Tropomyosin decorates sides stabilizing against cofilin, tropomodulin caps pointed ends, thymosin beta4 sequesters monomers, hence role of blocking further polymerization at plus end uniquely belongs to CapZ capping complex.

Ref: Pollard and Earnshaw, Cell Biology, Chapter 12: Capping Proteins CapZ and Barbed End Regulation.

The rate of actin polymerization is highest at which end of the filament?

Polarity arises because actin protomers are asymmetric and assemble head to tail orienting ATP hydrolysis vector. Myosin S1 decoration electron microscopy historically defined barbed and pointed ends based on arrowhead appearance. Kinetic measurements show association rate constant for ATP G actin about 11.6 per micromolar per second at plus end versus 1.3 at minus end, dissociation rate 1.4 per second versus 0.8. Net result polymerization velocity ten times faster at barbed end at any monomer level above Cc. This asymmetry explained by structural differences: barbed end exposes W loop and hydrophobic cleft accommodating incoming monomer, while pointed end requires subdomain rearrangement less favorable with ADP actin. In migrating cells free barbed ends concentrate at plasma membrane oriented outward producing pushing force for lamellipodia elongation. Minus ends face cell interior often capped by tropomodulin or embedded in Arp2/3 branch. Myosin V and most myosins move toward plus end guided by polarity, myosin VI moves opposite. This rapid growth bias enables directional protrusion and polarized transport.

Ref: Lodish et al., Molecular Cell Biology, 9th ed., Chapter 18: Actin Polarity and Barbed End Growth.