Skip to content

#protein trafficking

6 public questions tagged with this topic.

Which face of the Golgi apparatus is responsible for receiving vesicles from the ER?

Golgi polarity defined by cis entry face adjacent to ER exit sites and trans exit face oriented toward plasma membrane. Newly synthesized cargo packaged into COPII coated vesicles decorated with Sec23/24 cargo selection and Sar1 GTPase buds from ER after BiP quality control, fuses via TRAPP tethering to ER-Golgi intermediate compartment then to cis Golgi network marked by Rab1 and cis golgin GM130 and GRASP65. Here resident enzymes mannosidase I and N-acetylglucosamine transferase I begin processing, and retrieval of ER proteins via KDEL receptor and COPI retrograde occurs. Medial cisternae continue glycosylation, trans cisternae add galactose sialic acid and sulfation. Finally trans Golgi network defined by clathrin adaptors AP1, GGA sorts cargo to lysosomes or constitutive secretion. Time-lapse tracking of temperature-sensitive VSV-G shows arrival at cis within five minutes from ER release, traversing stacks in about twenty minutes, confirming cis as receiving face. Maturation face term describes cisternal progression model, but receiving function clearly cis, opposite orientation would reverse secretory direction.

Ref: Lippincott-S Cell Bio; COPII ER exit to cis Golgi CGN receives cargo, Rab1, VSV-G trafficking.

What signal is required for COPII-mediated ER-to-Golgi transport?

Selective inclusion of membrane cargo into COPII vesicles instead of bulk flow relies on export signals recognized directly by Sec24 adaptor subunit. Well-characterized ER export code is di-acidic DXE motif positioned four to ten residues downstream of transmembrane domain in cytosolic C-terminal tails of many type I proteins like VSV-G, Sys1, ERGIC-53, SNAREs Bet1, Sec22. Motif consists of Asp-X-Glu where both acidic side chains fit basic pockets formed by arginine and lysine in Sec24 B-site; upstream hydrophobic aromatic residues strengthen interaction. Crystal structures show Sec24C and Sec24D isoforms especially adept binding DXE while Sec24A-B prefer IxM signals. Mutation of DXE to AXA drastically lowers affinity slowing ER exit five to ten fold causing ER retention and degradation. KKXX at extreme C-terminus binds alpha beta prime COP I subunits for Golgi-to-ER retrieval opposite direction. Tyrosine-based YXXPhi recognized by mu subunit of AP complexes for clathrin-mediated TGN to endosome and plasma membrane endocytosis, NPXY recognized by PTB domains of Dab2 and ARH for LDL receptor uptake. Thus DXE uniquely encodes ER exit into COPII for anterograde traffic ensuring efficient export.

Ref: Lodish et al., MCB: DXE di-acidic motif recognized by Sec24 for COPII ER exit.

Which model best explains the movement of proteins through the Golgi?

Movement of cargo through Golgi stack, comprising cis, medial and trans cisternae plus trans-Golgi network, originally debated between stable cisternae with anterograde vesicle shuttling versus progressive maturation. Current consensus supported by live imaging in Saccharomyces cerevisiae where individual Golgi cisternae are dispersed and resolvable, by quantitative immunoelectron tomography and super-resolution microscopy, favors cisternal maturation model as primary mechanism for anterograde transport. New cis cisternae form de novo at ER-Golgi interface through homotypic fusion of COPII-derived carriers and ERGIC elements, supplied with cargo. Cisternae then move toward trans face while maturing by exchanging resident enzymes via retrograde COPI vesicles that recycle cis glycosyltransferases backward, converting cis to medial to trans identity, while cargo remains inside lumen. At trans-Golgi network, clathrin and adaptors sort lysosomal hydrolases to endosomes and secretory cargo to plasma membrane. Model naturally accommodates large supramolecular cargo such as procollagen triple helices three hundred nanometers long, algal scales and casein micelles that cannot fit into sixty nanometer vesicles, explains transient cisternal composition changes and integrates vesicular transport as retrograde recycling rather than forward shuttling, harmonizing biochemical and morphological observations across species and secretory systems.

Ref: Glick & Luini, Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 3: 2011, Cisternal Maturation Model for Golgi Transport.

The main difference between protein sorting and trafficking is that:

Cellular protein localization logic involves two distinct stages often conflated in textbooks. Sorting refers to informational decoding where targeting information encoded within polypeptide primary sequence or post-translational modification is read by dedicated soluble receptor: hydrophobic signal peptide binding SRP, basic NLS cluster binding importin-alpha, amphipathic mitochondrial presequence binding TOM20-TOM22, mannose-6-phosphate glycan recognized by MPR300, tripeptide SKL interacting with Pex5 for peroxisomes, or di-acidic ER exit signals bound by Sec24. Trafficking refers to mechanical execution that physically relocates protein using translocation channels, vesicle coats, tethering factors, motor proteins moving along cytoskeleton and SNARE-mediated fusion merging membranes. Sorting can occur co-translationally before synthesis completes, while trafficking typically continues post-translationally involving GTP and ATP hydrolysis. Both operate in prokaryotes via Sec and Tat pathways and in eukaryotes across all compartments, not limited to one kingdom or location, illustrating universal principle separating decision of where to go from machinery that gets there and ensuring proteome compartmentalization and efficient cellular organization throughout life. Additional coordination with cellular stress pathways ensures fidelity, prevents aggregation, and links trafficking to growth control and proteostasis maintenance across diverse cell types and developmental stages.

Ref: Alberts et al., Molecular Biology of the Cell, 6th ed., Chapter 12: Protein Sorting versus Trafficking.

What is the main function of Rab GTPases in protein trafficking?

Rab family is largest branch of Ras superfamily, more than sixty members in mammals, each localized to specific organelle defining compartment identity and regulating sequential vesicle traffic steps. C-terminal cysteine geranylgeranylation anchors Rab to cytosolic face of membranes. In active GTP-bound conformation, Rab recruits diverse effectors: tethering complexes EEA1 for Rab5 early endosomes, GARP and golgins for retrograde traffic, exocyst for Rab11 recycling vesicles, and motor adaptors linking vesicles to kinesin for anterograde or dynein-dynactin for retrograde movement along microtubules. Guanine exchange factors like Rabex-5 activate Rabs on designated membranes, while RabGAPs containing TBC domain stimulate hydrolysis converting to GDP form releasing effectors and allowing extraction by GDI for recycling. This cycle ensures specificity so COPII vesicles from ER fuse only with cis-Golgi, not lysosomes, and provides timing for endosomal maturation Rab5 to Rab7 conversion. Unlike importin transporting through nuclear pores or kinases phosphorylating SNAREs to regulate fusion, Rab orchestrates upstream vesicle targeting, motility and tethering coordinated with SNARE-mediated final fusion ensuring fidelity of trafficking pathways and organelle biogenesis.

Ref: Zerial & McBride, Nature Rev Mol Cell Biol 2: 2001, Rab GTPases Control Vesicle Targeting.

Which experiment first demonstrated the secretory pathway of protein trafficking?

Historical demonstration of secretory pathway utilized pulse-chase labeling paradigm coupled to electron microscopic autoradiography introduced by Nobel laureate George Palade. Model tissue pancreatic acinar cells specialized for massive secretion of digestive enzymes such as amylase, trypsinogen, chymotrypsinogen provided high signal. Tissue slices pulsed briefly for few minutes with tritiated leucine 3H-leucine incorporated into nascent polypeptides in rough endoplasmic reticulum, then chased with large excess non-radioactive leucine preventing further labeling enabling tracking of labeled cohort over time. Cells fixed at intervals, embedded in resin, sectioned ultra-thin, and coated with photographic emulsion; beta particles from decay produce silver grains marking protein location. Early grains localized over rough ER cisternae studded with ribosomes, intermediate grains over cis to trans Golgi stacks where glycosylation occurs, later over condensing vacuoles and mature zymogen granules, finally outside cell in acinar lumen. This vectorial progression proved proteins flow ER to Golgi to plasma membrane. This circuitry is highly conserved across eukaryotes, integrating growth factor signals, DNA damage surveillance, and developmental cues, and its disruption frequently underlies oncogenesis, providing targets for checkpoint inhibitors and cancer therapeutics.

Ref: Palade, Science 1975, Intracellular Transport. Alberts 7th ed., Chapter 12, Secretory Pathway History.