Skip to content

#protein mobility

2 public questions tagged with this topic.

Which of the following properties affects membrane protein mobility?

Diffusion behavior of membrane proteins governed by hydrodynamic and cytoskeletal factors. Saffman-Delbruck model relates diffusion coefficient D to membrane thickness h viscosity mu m and protein radius r through D proportional to natural log of membrane to protein size. Number of transmembrane domains increases effective radius and frictional drag because each helix engages annular lipids diffusing as complex and more extensive hydrophobic surface contacts viscous acyl chains. Single-pass glycophorin diffusion coefficient about five times ten to minus nine centimeters squared per second faster than seven-pass GPCR about one times ten to minus nine and fourteen-pass Band 3 about zero point five. Additional slowing originates from hop diffusion model developed by Kusumi showing actin cytoskeleton fences create compartments eighty to two hundred nanometers where proteins diffuse rapidly then hop between compartments limited by transient fence and picket interactions. Binding to immobilized ankyrin spectrin network reduces mobile fraction to fifty percent. Size of extracellular loops influences extracellular matrix interactions but less than transmembrane count, hydropathy index predicts insertion, pH charge limited effect. Number of transmembrane domains therefore primarily affects mobility.

Ref: Kusumi et al., Paradigm Shift in Membrane Protein Diffusion and Corral Model, Annu Rev Biophys.

In SDS-PAGE, slowest mobility implies:

SDS-PAGE combines denaturation with anionic detergent sodium dodecyl sulfate that confers uniform negative charge per unit length, nullifying intrinsic charge differences and unfolding proteins into rods. Migration through polyacrylamide sieving matrix becomes primarily size-dependent, with frictional resistance proportional to chain length. Smaller polypeptides encounter fewer obstacles, migrating farther and faster, while larger polypeptides experience greater retardation, remaining near top with slowest mobility. Tracking dye fronts indicate progress. This relationship allows molecular weight estimation using logarithmic calibration with standards, fundamental for assessing protein purity, subunit composition, and expression analysis.

Ref: NCERT Biology Class XII Principles on Klenow fill-in labeling, Lehninger Chapter 9 DNA cloning techniques, and Molecular Cloning by Sambrook Chapter 10 documenting end-labeling of cohesive termini.